Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
the FOrbes author was just too lazy or uninformed to do any calculations thahe had done for wind and solar.
Easy to find PLUG powers target Tons per day for US generation and multiply by $3,000 a day to see how much they will benefit
(clue 250 x $3000 x 365 is a lot) and there will be many others especially with the hubs being built. The hubs wouldn't be so popular if it weren't for the IRA tax credits.
FCEL can may be claim on TriGeneration projects they own and run (or their customer can benefit) amount will be less as not pure renewable energy source.
FCEL customers on the fuel cell tax credit (30%) as well.
but if the author has no idea of the hydrogen market they wont do the research for that article anyway
Your numbers are from the Forbes article - not the bill....
DUH!!!!
Tony Leo Executive VP of Technology FuelCell Energy
"It has been great working with the ExxonMobil team on advancing our carbon capture technology and we are looking forward to a great demonstration in Rotterdam."
Vertaling Weergeven?
https://stocktwits.com/Thomask88/message/487900014
*********
courtesy of Thomask88
https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertbryce/2022/08/05/big-wind-and-big-solar-will-collect-113-billion-in-tax-credits-this-decade-manchin-schumer-assures--billions-more/?sh=17fb98f629d0
THE EPITOME OF MIS-INFORMATION !
Quote " No dollar amounts appear in the bill.... it's a tax credit" READ the article
The essence of the bill as wrtten in the Forbes article I posted shows the $ am't of tax credits for each of solar and wind ie $319 billion. Forbes did the conversion into $$$'s.
Nothing is shown for Hydrogen as they regard that which is shown is a "loolipop".
Forbes took the time and the research. I've yet to see anything credible that contradicts it.
Most of the trading is going on off exchange today...
https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-fcel/exchange-volume/
If the market just shows some stability, it's my confident opinion this gets back to the 425 range next week easily with no news at all, which would include no bad news. With market stability and any good news we should surpass $5 in less than 2 weeks. This goes up much faster than it goes down simply look at the chart particularly the three-month chart makes it crystal clear and shows a recent pattern. Last time this tested support it bounced from $3.42, avoiding even testing the $3.25 level which I'm calling the floor. $5.2. It took a month and a half to get back to where we are. Previous test of $3.25 did the same thing, only with a lower high. Which obviously means higher highs and higher lows. Simply need market stability combined with no bad news.
2.5M shares at 10.44 is insignificant and does not indicate meaningful movement in either direction. Still awaiting a bump in volume for a few days in a row to give a clear signal to me. But one that happens we are likely to be a minimum of 20% higher within a week's time. Be awful nice to see this close over $3.60 but I'll take $350 for now or just green for that matter. Two or three days in a row would be nice but every day next week would be even better. Simply a matter of time and unfortunately taking a little longer than I would hope for. C'mon Groton, need agreement from the Navy and the EDC. Unfortunately we may have to wait till the end of next week for the update if a final decision was not made until today or yesterday. And now we know we have PORTHOS announcement coming it's just a matter of when and what the pr will look like. May have to wait until November for that one unfortunately but you never know.
As you all know I try to focus on the facts that support a more positive outlook. Girl of course several things to be concerned about mostly having to do with the overall economy and market. Groton status would be one of the top priority issues with the company in my opinion. Other than that I have no company concerns. Not anything significant enough to put on a list of something to worry about and in my opinion neither should anyone else. That said, on the bright side given the market and what happened with Ballard in particular but Bloom and plug also, and the rest of the market, we're not really that bad off. Especially when you consider we are still holding over $3.25. although obviously that appears to be at risk the rest of the week is anything like today. Hopefully the market has a bouncing store tomorrow as a reaction to today and hopefully it will be a nice bounce that pushes the share price above yesterday's close. We can hope anyway. Groton and to deal with Exxon Mobil would insure a bottom is in.
Sadly the destruction is not over and taking the S&P500 to 3400 is their game.
30 yr fixed mortgages now at 6.75% and the Fed wants to hit a 4.50 to 4.75% fed funds rate.
Cash is king.
************************
October will be very interesting for FCE.
Holy ----. This is clearly not about Fuel Cell Energy their potential or their fundamentals at all this is about extreme panic in the market and a massive sell-off. Last I looked the NASDAQ was down 3.5% and Ballard was down over 11%. Valor didn't have any news to justify that. At some point whenever that is there's going to be a massive spike in share price. Good luck timing it now seems like it's good a time as any.
I am confirming Exxon gave FCE the $5 million so your claim they are donating the equipment is wrong. You started the thread with incorrect information.
You are also wrong to assume FCE is giving Exxon $5M of equipment at this point.
"FCE has not determined the best way to revenue recognition of this milestone event....either to take the $5M as revenue and discount the equipment to Exxon at Rotterdam or to invest the $5M."
It will likely be decided on how many MW's the pilot project will be.
https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2022/03/10/fuelcell-energy-fcel-q1-2022-earnings-call-transcr/
**********************
You have been striking a negative tone for weeks now. You obviously have losses. If you want to hunt big game...don't shoot at the rabbits. Take your comments to ir@fce.com and get us some answers.
"Confirmation of FCEL in Rotterdam is great news and from the CEO of Exxon technology business"
this what was stated:
"This advanced platform was developed in collaboration with FuelCell Energy and can actually create additional power while simultaneously capturing carbon from industrial sources."
she was giving fcel credit for having collaborated with Exxon in building the platform....i dont see that as confirmation of fcel being involved in Rotterdam...
it SHOULD have been something that could be assumed...but seeing as how Exxon has refused to re-sign fcel, and gave them milestones to accomplish before deciding if they would do so, milestones as in plural, i find the credit given to fcel involvement in the platform falling a bit short of confirmation that they will be involved in Rotterdam...
odds are they will be, but id like to hear something a bit more firm from the company, given the circumstances...
so now you confirm they (FCEL) are giving them (Exxon Rotterdam project) $5m of equipment (if they are sensible).
anyone care to offer what the milestone was as we still havent been told
It appears you haven't gone back far enough in your research.
FuelCell Energy Conference Call transcript Q1 2022
" As Jason mentioned, during the three months ended January 31, 2022, the company achieved the first technical milestone under the JDA.
As a result, the company will receive a payment of $5 million. The company has not recognized revenue in connection with this milestone achievement as a result of our prior agreement with respect to a future potential demonstration project with EMRE at ExxonMobil's Rotterdam refinery in the Netherlands. Under this agreement, we agreed to either make an investment in the amount of $5 million in the Rotterdam project or discount EMRE's purchase of the company's fuel cell module and detailed engineering design for the Rotterdam project by the same amount. The company will continue to evaluate revenue recognition of this milestone achievement as project negotiations with ExxonMobil or a subsidiary thereof, evolve."
https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2022/03/10/fuelcell-energy-fcel-q1-2022-earnings-call-transcr/
***********************
Exxon gave FCE the $5 million.
nope. amendment #2 was nothing to do with milestones apart from supporting the Rotterdam facility and is expressly to be used as follows:
[we were never told what the actual milestone they achieved was were we?]
Yes but essentially the money came from Exxon is my point. By achieving the milestone Exxon gave FCE $5 million.
The news is the project confirmation which we are in agreement about...thanks to Dave.
You didn't read the whole filing
yes EMTEC extended the initial $45m investment in the project to $50m. that is total spend thiers and reimbursement of FCEL I believe). but there was this as well. (FCEL is "the company"):
I don't understand how you come to that conclusion about donating equipment.
Exxon gave FCE the $5 million that they will be investing.
Wow NASDAQ down over 3%. Somebody just announced anybody owning stocks in the next two years is going to end up impoverished? I give almost anything to have my largest commission check right now.
My reading was that the $5m was set as that would be the equipment value (at an undeclared sales price) allowing FCEL to actually spend far less on supplying the technology. Yes the people doing the work alongside EXXON would be accounted for as part of the project expense.
It doesn't really matter - apart from getting it right from an accounting point of view - we don't need a Hyzon/Plug issue with accounts.
Confirmation of FCEL in Rotterdam is great news and from the CEO of Exxon technology business
dollar amounts are allocated to tax credits.
it is a tax bill the capital budgets was in the infrastructure bill passed bipartisanly earlier this year.
a number of projects that may involved FCEL will get money from that bill.
it would be illegal for the govt to give out cash handouts to projects under the IRA unless it is done via tax credits
There's 1, I'll humbly admit I was expecting a different order of finish! RAOTFLMFAO!
ROTTERDAM DONE DEAL, PER EXXONMOBIL President of Technology! This was posted by Disgruntled David on ST this morning. Attn:. All shorts and bears "Read all about it" No it's ands or buts!
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/linda-ducharme_last-week-i-visited-exxonmobils-rotterdam-activity-6980969876542668800-VTSY?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android
Give away? I don't see it that way I believe their commitment was to invest $5 million dollars which may be the equivalent, depending upon the size of the project. Seeing as it is a pilot I don't expect it to be a large project but one never knows. Plus, since this is the first carbon capture project of this assumed scale, we do not know what the cost will be but I'm assuming it's over $5 million dollars. Repeatedly governments institutions and Independents have referenced the need for investment from all, which would include larger companies like Exxon and smaller companies like Fuelcell. The collaboration contract will be mentioned when the announcement is made but the investment May in fact be made at the end of the year and announced late December or early January.
No dollar amounts are allocated in the bill - not to solar or wind either. It is a stinking TAX CREDIT -
Therefore your response belongs with other gibberish posted
and placed where THE SUN DOESN'T SHINE.
If you think I'm wrong then find it in the bill and quote the text ...
The question was "What $ am't is allocated to Hydrogen in the Bill." The response lacks any indication that FCEL is earmarked for any sum. The answer is one of avoidance.
Therefore the response belongs with other non-information
and placed whereTHE SUN DOESN'T SHINE..
this is great news. It does indeed place FCEL at the center of Carbon Capture projects
FCEL effectively donated the SureSource system though didn't they? As part of the last collaboration extension? It is still a great endorsement of the technology.
Now to sign the commercialization agreement get upfront $$ and also sell to others.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4537535-fuelcell-energy-putting-lipstick-on-pig
The Rotterdam arrangement didn't move the needle. One contract between FCEL and Exxon in a long list of failed attempts to complete others like GROTON. So.Korea Orders, Toyota , and anything new in 9 months, is overweighing anything they may complete with EXXON.
$3.00 +/- coming up.
Rotterdam is not even mentioned anywhere in thecompany or Exxon announcements.
The stock pre-market is DOWN as I post this. That's the value of Rotterdam as the market sees it.
That news is going right back to where it belongs and where the " SUN DOES'NT SHINE " and it must be an uncomfortable place for the BULLS for so long.
There's 1, I'll humbly admit I was expecting a different order of finish! RAOTFLMFAO!
ROTTERDAM DONE DEAL, PER EXXONMOBIL President of Technology! This was posted by Disgruntled David on ST this morning. Shorts, and bears can stick this where the sun doesn't shine. No it's ands or buts!
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/linda-ducharme_last-week-i-visited-exxonmobils-rotterdam-activity-6980969876542668800-VTSY?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android
ROTTERDAM DONE DEAL, PER EXXONMOBIL President of Technology! This was posted by Disgruntled David on ST this morning. Shorts, and bears can stick this where the sun doesn't shine. No it's ands or buts!
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/linda-ducharme_last-week-i-visited-exxonmobils-rotterdam-activity-6980969876542668800-VTSY?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android
$3.60 good, $3.70 better, $3.80 best & should be go time.
Tick tock! The world is finally ready, interest and policy grow weekly.
We were ready to go ock in 2013, others weren't even in business then or not working on CHP or hydrogen.
https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2013/11/f4/ultra_efficient_patel.pdf
Oct 2020, ready to go now
https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2020/10/f79/IND%20FOA%20FY2020%20Summary-Abstract%20ARD-20-23636%20-%20FuelCell.pdf
100% UNFOUNDED B.S.
" Inspiring we had a steady climb through the rest of the day and after hours."
yea...im looking at the pps of $3.56 and im just not feeling any inspiration at all...
"We maintain above $3.40 and break over $3.60 by Friday we should be ready for a run."
smh...may as well flip a coin...
" The next 6 weeks should be a very memorable time in history. "
could be right...but that may not be a good thing..
"But by January earnings, we should be making new 52 week highs."
$11.63?....sure sure....why not?...heck, lets just say $111.63, what the hell....lol
" Groton would be a great start. "
may as well give up on groton...the pps is going to drop on the next groton news...no matter what the news is...
"Then ExxonMobil"
i think Exxon already walked away and didnt even bother to tell Few...lol
"very likely a mix of US, S. Korea, and European projects by end of January also."
dont forget Outer Mongolia or Nepal...i hear they want some fuell cells also...
Recap, volume me just under 10Mbutwell over recent historic low voltage.edays. specific just interest in the uptick exactly timed when bouncing off the low dipping below $3.40 briefly. Inspiring we had a steady climb through the rest of the day and after hours. We maintain above $3.40 and break over $3.60 by Friday we should be ready for a run. Of course, month ends Friday. No update by Thursday (10/6) probably not good in regard to Groton. Awful nice to get any + news by Monday, but Thursday at the latest. Really much rather start a run back to $4, then get good news and run to $5 swiftly. The next 6 weeks should be a very memorable time in history. But by January earnings, we should be making new 52 week highs. Groton would be a great start. Then ExxonMobil, the Toyota, and very likely a mix of US, S. Korea, and European projects by end of January also.
NO $$$$ Amount is shown on the Bill " Lollipops" for Solar and Wind then...
Your post is a total fiction...
TOTAL B.S.
You didn't link to a bill - you linked to an article. The article is an estimate of the value of tax credits that will be covered by the bill.
THE BILL DOES NOT GIVE THESE FIGURES....
No facts at all - just repeating a third party's estimates.
I read the bill others have posted. It doesn't contain any $$$ amount earmarked for Hydrogen. $$$amount. How many times must I repeat it.
Tell me the $$$$ am't and where you found it. When its found only then can there be an intelligent discussion.
The article I posted is directly derived from the Bill.
NO $$$$ Amount is shown on the Bill " Lollipops" for Hydrogen. Of that, what will FCEL get.
In any case, the market finds the Bill and what's in it as unconvincing. It's been unimpressive as I'm sure you've noticed by the incessant drop in sh/px.
I'm not here to promote when its not deserved. Too much of that non-sense has been tried and found unsuccessful.
why dont you post the actual bill like others have - and read it.
https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr5376/BILLS-117hr5376enr.pdf
search the bill for hydrogen.
found on 17 pages
including
Must reads
https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=https://www.miningweekly.com/article/green-hydrogen-fuel-cells-important-part-of-any-future-energy-system-says-global-strategist-2022-09-27&ct=ga&cd=CAEYACoTMzU2NTUxNTU4NTc0NzYyMzQzMzIaM2Y2YzEyOGYyMzM0YTgyODpjb206ZW46VVM&usg=AOvVaw2DJFxi1yD1lNjK-x4Z5ERp
https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=https://www.mlive.com/public-interest/2022/09/hydrogen-could-be-critical-fuel-for-trucks-ferries-and-freighters-in-michigan.html&ct=ga&cd=CAEYCCoTMzU2NTUxNTU4NTc0NzYyMzQzMzIaM2Y2YzEyOGYyMzM0YTgyODpjb206ZW46VVM&usg=AOvVaw3sp6I0cg3WJ8mEnhZZ610H
If there's any doubt that the bill contains $113 billion earmarked for Solar & Wind combined and none mentioned for Hydrogen, here's the full Schumer/Manchin Bill. Total $371 billion including $28.7 billion, Nuclear $3.44 billion and the remainder for "special interests" unrelated to clean energy.
Per the article, Hydrogen is to get a "lollipop" amount, not worth mentioning.
Any implication that hydrogen will be a big beneficiary is FALSE AND INACCURATE
These are thefacts and numbers don't lie!!!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertbryce/2022/08/05/big-wind-and-big-solar-will-collect-113-billion-in-tax-credits-this-decade-manchin-schumer-assures--billions-more/?sh=17fb98f629d0
Lest not forget Asian news coming.
https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2022/08/419_335121.html
And Toyota possibly COD in 2022
https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/port-of-rotterdam-awards-contract-for-new-hydrogen-pipeline-along-the-moezelweg-to-swietelsky-rail-benelux-b-v/
1 year ago, puzzle pieces
https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/Sustainability/Energy-and-Carbon-Summary/Strategy/Developing-and-deploying-scalable-technology-solutions
https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/Climate-solutions/CCS-in-action
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/energy/news/advanced-molten-carbonate-fuel-cell-research-rig-unique-uk-arrives-translational-energy-research
Today in our "Transitions" blog, FCHEA looks at the wide range of public and private groups that are planning to apply for the historic $7b in Regional Clean #Hydrogen Hub funding: https://t.co/wl50KE2xJW
— Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Association (@FCHEA_News) September 26, 2022
Apologies, I picked up the million mention from another poster. Of course millions is absurd. Replace millions with BILLIONS in this discussion.
NO $ AMOUNT IN THE BILL FOR WIND OR SOLAR
That's because there are no dollar amounts in the bill, LOL!
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376/text
Hydrogen is mentioned 78 times, wind is mentioned 77 times, solar only 43.
Your post is FACTUALLY INCORRECT...
You found the $113 billion figure in the article you linked in this post:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170036072
It was an estimate given in the article, but it is not given in the bill.
WRT "the bill". there is a ton of money for hydrogen but only those who manufacture it will get the per kg credit. with some claiming PLUG will get paid to make hydrogen in 2025 athe cost will be $2/kg and they get $3/kg credit for true green hydrogen.
https://www.utilitydive.com/news/ira-subsidies-green-hydrogen/632599/
IMHO FCEL is more interested in the income tax credit for use of fuel cell, which was increased and I believe would cover installing SureSource systems. (do they still sell these in the US?)
I recall there is also money for carbon capture tax credits but until we have comercial solution I suspect. Exxon would claim that not FCEL.
NO $ AMOUNT IN THE BILL FOR HYDROGEN.
Any effort to prop the stock (FCEL) is missing a few factors preventing it.
1) The Bill earmarks $113 bil for Solar and Wind. There is no amount mentioned for Hydrogen and therefore FCEL.
2) Delays and costs persist as a result of weather related issues. The economic impact of the hurricanine impacts shipments, deliveries, expenses and cost. Delays of orders are sure to be seen.
3) Buying interest in stocks has dried up. Speculative penny stocks are seeing less interest while any bounce will go into the quality names. Any going into FCEL will be the 9th Dead Cat Bounce
Sept was hoped for as the month positive news would be released. It hasn't materialized as was each of the last 14 months.
The stock didn't get close to $5.00 as was said to happen.
Both technical and the lack of favorable news to allow it was/is absnt. The quarterly report saw to that. Abyssmal!
The technicals remain negative and the stock already is struggling to hold in the laast bastion of support ie $3.45-$3.50. Given the negative trend, $3.00-$3.25 can come quickly.
Bulls now will pushdates out to Oct-Nov and Year end
The record of their failed calls gives no confidence these will be any different.
The professionals have done proper research. They've been proven right from the $29 high to todays px. For that reason the credibilty factor rests with them. No other kinds of so-called research has proven correct.
That most recent temporary support level I referred to of $3.42 unfortunately is in jeopardy. Historically the majority of the time on lower volume when we are at support levels we do dip below. Although there have been occasions where volume picks up once we touch those support levels or come close and the stock shoots up quickly. Really hoping for the latter. I'd like to avoid testing what I call the floor of $3.25. some good news today could be a game changer. Come on crew let's get something positive out there. How about even a progress report? Groton went into full operation at 6 megawatts something like that. Lol
I think I had a pretty good idea leave this morning we'll find out shortly. November 18th $4 calls.
FuelCell Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: FCEL) is an integrated fuel cell company that designs, manufactures, installs, operates and services stationary fuel cell power plants.
As a leading global fuel cell company, we provide ultra-clean, efficient and reliable baseload distributed generation for electric utilities, commercial and industrial companies, universities, municipalities, government entities and other customers around the world.
Direct FuelCell® (DFC®) power plants manufactured by FuelCell Energy can utilize a variety of fuels including renewable biogas from wastewater treatment and food processing, as well as clean natural gas, directed biogas and propane.
Our DFC power plants produce power electrochemically — without burning fuels — making them clean, quiet and environmentally responsible alternatives to combustion-based generation.
Our power plants have generated more than 1.5 billion kilowatt hours of ultra-clean electricity, equivalent to powering more than 135,000 average-size U.S. homes for one year.
FuelCell Energy’s world headquarters are located in Danbury, Connecticut, in the USA. Our global markets are served from a state-of-the-art production facility in nearby Torrington, Connecticut.
Our customers in Europe are served by German-based FuelCell Energy Solutions, GmbH, a majority owned joint venture with sales and service located in Dresden, Germany and manufacturing in Ottobrunn, Germany, which is near Munich.
Customers in Asia are served by our partner POSCO Energy from manufacturing facilities located in Pohang, South Korea.
FuelCell Energy offers a comprehensive portfolio of services for fuel cell power plants. Specially trained technicians and engineers remotely operate and maintain virtually our entire installed base of Direct FuelCell power plants globally, 24 hours per day, 365 days per year from the state-of-the-art Global Technical Assistance Center located at our Danbury, Connecticut headquarters. Field service technicians directly employed by FuelCell Energy service the power plants on-site.
FuelCell Energy scientists are actively researching unique applications for our versatile DFC technology including hydrogen generation and carbon capture. In addition, we are pursuing research with solid oxide fuel cells as well ashydrogen compression and storage.
FuelCell Energy’s international reputation for leadership in ultra-clean energy solutions has been built on a long history of innovative research and development that reflects the successes of our highly talented and creative workforce. We are the first fuel cell manufacturer to commercialize megawatt-class stationary fuel cell power plants and we believe that we are the first stationary fuel cell manufacturer to generate a quarterly gross profit.
FuelCell Energy traces its roots back to 1969 and the founding of Energy Research Corporation (ERC) by early fuel cell pioneers Bernard Baker and Martin Klein, both chemical engineers with expertise in advanced battery technologies.
In the 1970′s, with funding from the U.S. military and utility companies, the Company conducted extensive research into low-temperature fuel cells as well as silver-zinc battery cells. In the 1980′s and 1990′s the Company switched its focus to high-temperature carbonate fuel cell systems which offered greater commercial applications due to the ability to internally reform readily available fuels such as natural gas and renewable biogas within the fuel cell itself to provide the hydrogen for the power generation process.
Our first commercial power plant was installed in 2003 using a 250 kilowatt (kW) fuel cell stack. Through technology enhancements and cost reductions, we have increased the power output of the stacks by 40 percent to 350 kW and reduced product costs by more than 60 percent. Today we are installing multi-megawatt fuel cell plants and fuel cell parks globally.
The production facility in Torrington, Connecticut, USA was completed in 2001 and produced [2] megawatts (MW) of product the first year. As of the end of fiscal year 2012, the plant was producing at an annual run-rate of 56 MW. The total annual capacity of the facility is 90 MW.
FuelCell Energy began expanding globally in 2007 through its partnership with POSCO Energy , targeting markets in Southeast Asia, particularly South Korea. A European manufacturing, sales and service presence was established in 2012, with German-based FuelCell Energy Solutions, GmbH.
1969 | Company founded as Energy Research Corporation (ERC) |
1992 | 120 kilowatt fuel cell stack demonstrated |
1992 | Initial Public Offering (IPO) |
1996 | 2 megawatt demonstration plant installed in Santa Clara, California |
1999 | Company focuses on carbonate fuel cells, is renamed FuelCell Energy, Inc. & spins off battery division, Evercel |
2003 | First commercial installation of a Direct FuelCell® power plant |
2003 | Annual production of approximately 3 megawatts |
2007 | POSCO Energy partnership begins – global expansion commences |
2007 | Annual production of approximately 11 megawatts |
2009 | Production of 350 kilowatt stack commences |
2011 | Power output milestone reached with one billion kWh of ultra clean electricity produced since 2003 |
2011 | 11 megawatt fuel cell park commences operations in South Korea |
2011 | Annual production of approximately 46 megawatts |
2012 | European presence established with FuelCell Energy Solutions, GmbH |
2012 | Asian manufacturing strategy implemented through license agreement with POSCO Energy |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |