EP Global Communications Inc fka EPGL

[Stock_Barber]

David Markus BOLTED Inwith 2 years ago!

Is anyone going to start a class action against these clowns, or just take the 100% loss as a lesson?

[nowy257]

Why nobody told me of BITCOIN few years ago , I lost so much time with this stinky penny stocks , are you guys still playing with this trash stocks?

[Stock_Barber]

There is an echo here...

Management took investors' money and left!

[nowy257]

Hello

[Stock_Barber]

Quite obvious that was the case...

100% loss to the Bunnyman!

Yea!

[Atlanta1]

any of you guys willing to admit yet that Bunnyman got the gold mine and you got the shaft?

[Stock_Barber]

Are EPGL/InWith investors rich yet?

[Stock_Barber]

Yup... all of the investors' money vanished down the rabbit hole!

[franck92]

EPGL became a private company under the name of "Inwith corporation".

[Atlanta1]

because Bunnyman is a conman....

[BayTrader280]

Why?

[flaflyersfan]

BayTrader280, no. EPGL stock is gone. Any reissue would not include previous EPGL shareholders. EOM

[BayTrader280]

Filings to get current then name change could happen?

[flaflyersfan]

BayTrader280, they supposedly reverse merged into InWith but EPGL stock was Revoked. EOM

[BayTrader280]

Shell maybe they'll RM?

[Stock_Barber]

I already did...

[franck92]

Ask to Bausch and Lomb, that is all. hahaha, byebye.

[Stock_Barber]

I already know the answer...

[franck92]

ask to Bausch and Lomb lmfao.

[Stock_Barber]

According to no one...

It is a misunderstanding (that the company failed to publicly correct) that the test pattern was an actual circuit!

And just because they could put a test grid into a hydrogel lens doesn't mean it didn't delaminate and/or cut its way out with just a few flexes of the lens!

The absence of test data (or even claims of any testing) is all one needs to know to know that it didn't survive!

[Atlanta1]

according to whom?

[franck92]

wrong they integrated their technology in SOFT hydrogel contact lens of their partner, Basuch and Lomb, Period.

[Stock_Barber]

Once, 3 times... what's the difference?

Inwith corporation has SOFT smart contact lenses

InWith does not have a soft smart lens! PERIOD! END OF STORY!

THEY HAVE A TEST GRID THAT DOES NOTHING IN A SOFT LENS!

And this was once declared the future of aviation:

[franck92]

They wrote only one time "Imwith" instead of "INWITH", only once.

Mojo vision has only HARD smart contact lenses.

Inwith corporation has SOFT smart contact lenses, built with hydrogel, wider market, bigger market, and much more applications on existing Hydrogel devices and ones to comes. Their technology is integrated in their partner's soft hydrogel contact lenses, Bausch and Lomb.

[Stock_Barber]

Too bad it is a steaming pile of hooey!

So well researched too! They call the company "Imwith"! LMAO!

Here is a company ACTUALLY making smart lenses (without Imwith's help):

https://www.auganix.org/augmented-reality-contact-lens-company-mojo-vision-raises-additional-usd-51-million-in-series-b-1-funding-round/

[franck92]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/charliefink/2020/03/09/inwith-puts-smart-tech-in-bausch-and-lomb-lenses/#1f5d689b796a

InWith Corporation, which holds key enabling IP in augmented contact lenses, has been at work with Bausch and Lomb (NYSE: BHC) to develop smart contacts for the past year. InWith plans for an Institutional Review Board approval this year on first prototypes. InWith co-founder and CEO Michael Hayes says the unique marriage marriage of highly biocompatible materials with 3-D flexible microelectronics embedded into molded hydrogel devices, which InWith calls “smart biology,” may be on the market “in the near future.”

XR
The world's first picture of a silicon chip inside a real, soft contact lens. Soon, chips like this ... [+] INWITH
With InWith’s technology, the augmented lens is just like the soft contact lens 150 million people use every day. Except they’re connected to your phone. They harvest energy from the normal blinking of the eyes. Check your blood sugar. Send alerts and notifications. “This opens the door to hundreds of new devices: blood chemistry for cancer and virus detection, drug delivery, artificial organ parts with electronics for movement,” said Hayes in an interview. “This is the next big wave; the merger of the mobile device into the human body for full monitoring of your health. It will lead to less disease and longer lives.”

XR, AR
ImWith diagram illustrating the elements of their system. INWITH
Today In: Consumer Tech

Samsung Confirms Cool Galaxy Watch Feature That Outdoes Apple, But There’s A Catch
Apple Watch Series 6 Leak Details 5 Great Innovations, Including 1 Killer Feature
Apple Loop: iPhone SE Problems, iPhone 12 Price Leaks, MacBook Pro’s Missing Features
Hayes is the co-inventor, with Dr. David Markus PhD, of InWith’s medical device, microelectronics and ophthalmic patents. Some of the patents used are: (1) Energy Harvesting from the blinking human eye to power a contact lens; (2) Defining space inside hydrogel devices such as contacts, for computer circuitry to be embedded during manufacturing; and (3) Smart case for charging smart contact lenses in liquid medium, while not in use. There are more, and some pending.

InWith’s remarkably small team of five has been working alongside a much larger team of scientists on the smart contact lens’ development. “In Bausch and Lomb’s labs, our smart technology is embedded in the Bausch and Lomb ULTRA contacts, which are the best multifocal lenses on the market today.” Said Hayes.

XR
Inventors, and co-founders of ImWith, Michael Hayes and David Markus, PhD, with fellow founders ... [+] IMWITH
“The era of fully monitored health and well-being is coming and it requires biocompatibility mixed with circuitry,” says Hayes. “Won't it be cool when early detection of virus, cancer, etc., will be in micro hydrogel implants that alert your smartphone, like your home has carbon monoxide and smoke detectors? Commonplace.” Hayes says at scale the augmented contacts won’t cost much more than the current contact lenses.

Bausch and Lomb is a leading manufacturer of contact lenses, which is an $18 Bn market. "Bausch + Lomb continuously seeks the latest advancements in eye care technology,” said Arthur Shannon, SVP of Bausch and Lomb.

Last month, Mojo Vision came out of stealth with its own augmented contact lenses. They are doing a pilot with Vista Vision Center of Palo Alto helping sight impaired people navigate low light situations. “The future is wet,” said Hayes. “This is just the DOS phase for this technology. We’re going to have bio implants. It won’t end here.”

XR
Up close with InWith smart contact lens. INWITH
Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn. Check out my website or some of my other work here.
Charlie Fink
Charlie Fink
Charlie Fink is an AR/VR Consultant, Forbes Columnist, and the Author of "Charlie Fink’s Metaverse, An AR Enabled Guide to VR & AR" (2018) and "Convergence, How The World… Read More

[alan81]

Yeah, they crack me up.
My relationship with verizon has advanced beyond just a relationship! We now have a signed contract. Please send me millions of dollars
Alan

[Koog]

Did not they take a picture in front of the Google sign a few years ago?

I know they took a photo of themselves by the sign in front of the Intel Corp. Robert Noyce Building in Santa Clara in a feeble attempt to claim some kind of relationship that did not exist.

I was able to debunk that one quickly and easily.

[Stock_Barber]

It may not be a paid article, but I'd wager the guy that wrote it is either Bunnyman's friend, an EPGL bagholder, or both!

[price_and_volume]

I may be mistaken.

I accept your explanation, as I likely have ad-blockers turned-on in both firefox & brave.

However, the article has all the markings of a PR campaign; surely I’m not the only one who recognizes this.

Regardless, I’m hopeful these types of advances continue to progress.

[flaflyersfan]

2 con men taking a picture in front of a picture of Bausch and Lomb;

Not impressive. Did not they take a picture in front of the Google sign a few years ago?

Good luck.

[jhnvtjll]

Wrong! There are actually ads embedded in the article. You don't see it probably because of an ad-blocker. The word "PROMOTED" is for the ad, not the article about InWith.

Here's what it really looks like:






It's the same for the ad on the bottom of the article. I see all ads because I don't use ad-blockers.

[price_and_volume]

FORBES does paid-for 'promos' called 'Native Advertising'

Paid-for Promotional Advertising, designed to appear as an actual "Forbes- branded" article, are now common.

They're paid-for awareness-campaigns, typically just re-hashed company PR that appear to be 'written' by a freelancer, who gets paid for attaching their name to the 'article.'

Journalistic standards require them to include the terms 'promoted' or 'advertisement' somewhere, tho they're often small & innocuous-enough to be unnoticed, which is the point.

I think most folks already KNOW THIS, as it's common to see these articles linked-to on IHUB. Just thought I'd post a reminder...

[Stock_Barber]

Is ex-management in jail yet?

No, why not?

Investors happy being conned?

[jhnvtjll]

Well, not the same to me. The SEC is enforcing the law, different than shareholders suing the company.

It's like the city health department shutting down a restaurant for unsafe food handling, or FBI charging a restaurant owner for tax fraud. It's different than a customer suing the restaurant for food poisoning or misleading advertisements.

[alan81]

It is really the same thing. Since little money is to be made, many law firms may not take up the case, but the SEC will. They are still shareholders initiating action against a malevolent company or individuals.
Sometimes there are civil actions in conjunction with an SEC action, and sometimes they include criminal charges.
Here is an example class action lawsuit...
http://securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1062/BCL00_01/202033_r01x_17CV04937.pdf
Alan

[jhnvtjll]

Those are SEC litigations, which of course I have seen all the time. I thought you were talking about shareholder lawsuits.

So shareholders still have the opportunity to sue Hayes as an officer of inWith?

Perhaps you lead a sheltered life? In 2018 (the last year I have seen data for) there were 441 shareholder lawsuits in the US.

[alan81]

For example, here is a summary of SEC initiated actions against microcap stocks:
https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/microcap/otc-litigation_dera.pdf

Here is a recent (2018) example lawsuit:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2018/lr24026.htm
https://www.sec.gov/files/PartialJudg17-cv-62345RubboJoseph.pdf
--Alan

[jhnvtjll]

How many successful? Show me link of sample lawsuits of a penny stock.

[jhnvtjll]

There are thousands of penny stock scams, but not once have I seen a shareholder lawsuit.

[alan81]

There are a number of things a corporate principal could do that would result in a lawsuit. For instance, if they were to deceive shareholders in some way, perhaps by posting under a pseudonym on a message board.
Just one example,
Alan

[vikingzskillz]

Nothing to gain by posting a single thing here, but for those that have been holding shares, $$$$$$$$$$hit's about to get REAL soon!

[jhnvtjll]

I don't know of any shareholders of pinksheet stocks suing. It's like buying bread at the Pepperidge Farm Bakery Outlet store and suing them because the bread isn't fresh.

[alan81]

Ah... just staying under the radar until now? So shareholders still have the opportunity to sue Hayes as an officer of inWith?
Alan

[jhnvtjll]

Markus is President, not CEO.

[alan81]

InWith co-founder and CEO Michael Hayes.
Is this true? Hayes was not even listed as an officer on the Inwith web site... Marcus was listed as CEO. Did Marcus give the corporation back to Hayes? I noticed they finally did a web site update with this "news" while dropping the "about us" page that listed officers without Hayes.
Alan

[CommonVestor]

I had to come back for old time sake and say congratulations to you and us Viking, we knew it was real the whole time. This is further ahead then we thought, Hayes and Markus are the real deal. I don’t remember anyone having more conviction then you so I hope you $$$ benefit for all your time and money spent.

[flaflyersfan]

vikingzskillz, did you or anyone else step back and think why anyone would need any of that information INSIDE a contact lens?;

Soon, chips like this can contain patient/doctor data, prescription info and processing for cool new focus and AR abilities.

Good luck

[Stock_Barber]

ROFL! It appears to be floating in there (although it could be behind it) and in the field of vision with no circuit connection... and it does NOTHING!

And what is that "chip"? That case size would have virtually zero capabilities!

That is a FREAKING JOKE!

Actually, it is FRAUD!

But why? Shares to sell somehow? Maybe to defer shareholder lawsuits?

[Koog]

#1: This "silicon chip" Is within the field-of-vision. I just had intraocular lens implants to correct cataracts and I am glad I have nothing like that in front of my eyes.

#2: This is not a "silicon chip". I am retired from Intel Corp.

#3: Do you have a link for this image? Or is it from your Photoshop file?