California Oil & Gas (fka COGC)

[RHenne]

Does this company even exist anymore?

[CashCowMoo]

you are a lying promoter, this company is trash.

[CashCowMoo]

another joke of a company

[Renee]

COGC revoked:

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2012/34-66730.pdf

[FORDGT]

Still active and Oil is still going up!! By June we could see price of oil triple...
Business Entity Information
Status: Active File Date: 6/21/2002
Type: Domestic Corporation Entity Number: C15750-2002
Qualifying State: NV List of Officers Due: 6/30/2012
Managed By: Expiration Date:
NV Business ID: NV20021351002 Business License Exp: 6/30/2012

[Renee]

COGC SEC Suspension:

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2012/34-66418.pdf

SEC Admin Proceeding:

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2012/34-66419.pdf

[SuperC]

COGC.018 132k vs 8k_vol 10dayavg, again, COGC runs back up to .018 on a huge 10day disparity. Highly unusual for a quick trade play by all including MM's just trying too get noticed.

In my opinion this has set dormant for quite sometime.

If there is value here from the past, someone knows it. Most 10Day Alerts are just per-run indicators, short and sweet.

I have my doubts about this one being just a quickie based on past alert data.

Watching

We'll see!

sc

[OilStockReport]

Great question. I was wondering the same thing!

[Netzarim]

So why the surge.... I see no new news updates... I am curious... I have shares in this stock. so I have a vested interest in this stop... I want to see it go up higher.. I am just trying to understand why it has surged to .02 with no supportive corporate information to go with it.

[SuperC]

COGC.0195 Monday

[OilStockReport]

Seeking due diligence if you hear anything I am interested.

[findsdot]

Did this get a buy reco ??

[downsideup]

Looks like old news is the only news there is...

You think this still has any life left in it ???

I have no idea what they're doing... but it looks dead to me.

[findsdot]

That's last years news...

[downsideup]

COGC are no longer partners in the East Slopes project, with the loss of their interest occurring in two steps.

COGC was the operator in the East Slopes, partnered with DBRM and Chevron, and COGC was also partnered with DBRM in the Krotz Springs project where DBRM was operator. The Krotz Springs project had cash calls for meeting the cost of development in that effort that COGC was unable to meet. DBRM eventually moved to enforce the unmet COGC obligations that they had had to cover for them to sustain the DBRM interest as operator in the Krotz Springs...

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1164256/000120095209000031/dbrm_10q-81130.htm#part2item1

In the result, COGC lost their Krotz Springs interest, and a portion of their East Slopes related positions, in the Dyer Creek and S.E. Edison prospect areas:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1164256/000120095209000220/dbrm_10k-90228.htm#item3

Subsequently, or in parallel, COGC was also unable to meet its financial obligations as operators in the East Slopes project, with the result that DBRM eventually was appointed to replace COGC as operator in the East Slopes, and DBRM was required to assume responsibility for paying something over $1 million in COGC's accrued and unpaid obligations tied to their problematic effort in operation of the East Slopes project.

In that result, COGC's remaining interests in the East Slopes project were turned over to DBRM as the new operator in partial payment of their unmet East Slopes obligations, and those returned East Slopes interests were then re-vended by DBRM to new participants, as described here:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1164256/000120095209000258/dbrm_8k-90616.htm

In the result, DBRM ended up as operator for the East Slopes project in the AMI with Chevron, while getting stuck with COGC's unpaid bills re their East Slopes operations effort. COGC's former interest in the East Slopes was then transferred to others, enabling a partial reimbursement of the large cash outlay that DBRM had imposed on them with the obligation to pay off those unmet COGC obligations.

The former COGC interest is now held by private investors, O&G Energy Partners, LLC and their partner, San Joaquin Investments, Inc.

That leaves DBRM and Chevron as the only publicly traded options allowing investors to participate in the development of the East Slopes project... with DBRM obviously being the only pure play.

GLTA

[findsdot]

Has anyone called the company lately ??

[koko23]

any hope for this company?

[findsdot]

Seems like it takes forever to get some news on progress, anyone know something ??

[maverick one]

They are producing oil looks like that 3D from Chevron really helped out alot.

[maverick one]

East Slope is a nice project to be partnered with Daybreak and Chevron.

[maverick one]

Answering myself here I think it is still...based in Calgary.

[maverick one]

Is this currently still partnered with Daybreak Oil out of Spokane in the East Slopes Project?

[john wayne]

Nice day today. I sniffed out a run here but missed the play. Congrats to you.

[findsdot]

I have some..

[john wayne]

Are you in this Find?

[findsdot]

And now the "E" for filing late.I see over 1 million shares traded on 4/02 was that buying or selling ??
Is this a ploy to scare people into selling so mgnt can buy some cheap shares ??

[Land Agent]

We must wonder WHAT the boss has done to ruin the company ? ? ? -- Perhaps on purpose ? ? ? -- IMO --

[findsdot]

And no .50 either..

[Land Agent]

Your guess is as good as mine -- IMO -

[findsdot]

.50 is that after a reverse spit ??

[Land Agent]

It's coming -- 50 cents is EASY by summer -- IMO --

[findsdot]

Land Agent, Where's that fifty cents ??

[Land Agent]

THE IDIOT MANAGEMENT -- WHO ELSE -- IMO --

[findsdot]

Who's doing all the selling ??

[findsdot]

[findsdot]

Some news would help..

[TITAN]

[Land Agent]

FIFTY-CENTS pps coming on 2009 even with cheap oil -- IMO --

[Land Agent]

First well GOOD -- 3 more wells coming -- it's a shame they couldn't have drilled last summer when oil was so high -- anyway with 4 wells pumping they plan on 8 more -- 12 total in the greatest oil county in CALIFORNIA -- IMO --

[findsdot]

Where's the action ??

[J-Rhino]

WHen will they hire a REAL sales force???

[FORDGT]

IN ON FRIDAY... INSIDERS BUYING............ AND OIL WON'T STAY DOWN LONG... AFTER ELECTION BACK TO 160 A BARREL WATCH AND SEE..

[westeffer]

COGC is stumbling along with dilutive financing to participate so I am not impressed. I am out of COGC and into DBRM quite awhile back.

[Land Agent]

WATCH NOW for 50 cents as predicted -- IMO --

[Land Agent]

OCT 30 -- California Kern County -- COGC news -- 4 new wells scheduled to drill to 3500 ft in Nov -- COGC is 1/8 owner of all -- CHEVRON owns 50% of all -- locations have been determined by CHEVRON sesmic -- COGC is in charge of drilling -- GREAT NEWS -- IMO --

[westeffer]

I assume they need more money and it depends on whether they are able to get financing. The most recent financing was for a small amount and very short term.

[findsdot]

How low will it go ??

[eatmenasdaq]

California Oil & Gas Corp - Current report filing (8-K)

In there 8k here it is.



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) August 14, 2008

CALIFORNIA OIL & GAS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

333-50375

(Commission File Number)

98-0389524

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

#2000, 633 – Sixth Avenue SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 2Y5

(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)

403-261-1965

Registrant's telephone number, including area code

#260, 600 – Sixth Avenue SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 0S5

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))



Item 1.01
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement



On August 14, 2008, we signed a loan agreement with Humboldt Capital Corporation whereby Humboldt Capital Corporation agreed to loan to our company $250,000 in consideration for the issuance of 500,000 shares of our common stock to Humboldt Capital Corporation.


The loan is due and payable on September 30, 2008 together with interest from the date of the advance to September 30, 2008 at a rate of 10% per annum.





Item 3.02.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities



On August 19, 2008, we issued 500,000 shares of our company to one investor in consideration for a loan of $250,000. The lender is not a U.S. person and we relied on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 provided by Regulation S promulgated thereunder.




CW2057139.1

[Land Agent]

WHERE DID YOU SEE THAT ?? THANKS --

[eatmenasdaq]

I see they issued 500,000 shares to borrow $250,00 from Aug 19 to Sept 30th. My question is what are they working on that they need $250,000 for only 40 days or so. Is something big in the making?