Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Keep BLDW on radar.
Building Turbines' New Partner ATG-LED, Announces Sale of Approximately $250,000 to Physicians Center Project, in Houston, TX
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=55938666&symbol=BLDW
Low floater, moves with ease.
Share Structure
Market Value1 $6,198,962 a/o Jan 18, 2013
Shares Outstanding 182,322,416 a/o Sep 30, 2012
Float 10,382,824 a/o Jun 30, 2011
Authorized Shares 500,000,000 a/o Sep 30, 2012
Par Value 0.001
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLDW/company-info
only a brainwashed fool would disagree with any of that.
Greengate gets green light to build Halkirk wind farm
By Richard Froese - Stettler Independent
Published: February 10, 2010 10:00 AM
Updated: February 10, 2010 10:43 AM
Halkirk-Castor will have Alberta’s largest wind energy farm in about one year, following the approval of the Greengate Power Corporation project by the Alberta Utilities Commission.
Greengate expects to begin to construct the $350 million project later this year, with a target commercial date of spring 2011.
“We are very pleased to receive AUC approval for what will be the largest wind energy project in Alberta,” said Dan Balaban, president and chief executive officer of Greengate, a privately-held renewable energy project developer based in Calgary.
“The AUC was satisfied that approval of this project is in the public interest and that the project complies with all regulatory requirements.”
When completed, the wind farm will supply a clean source of electricity for approximately 50,000 homes, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 300,000 tonnes per year, equivalent to removing 60,000 cars from Alberta’s roads.
Greengate plans to plant 100 wind turbines 80 metres tall on 20,000 acres construction is expected to take nine to 12 months.
Each turbine would have a rotor with a diameter of 77 meters.
Under the proposal, turbines would be located between Halkirk and Castor on four areas:
• Sections 34 and35, Township 37, Range 15, west of the 4th meridian.
• Sections 1 to 30 and 32 to 36, Township 38, Range 15, west of the 4th meridian.
• Section 3, Township 39, Range 15, west of the 4th meridian.
• Sections 5 to 7 and 15 to 20, Township 38, Range 14, west of the 4th meridian.
The project is divided into two 150MW phases.
Located in a wind swept area of Alberta consisting of flat cultivated land and grazing land, initial Microscale Modelling indicates a very good wind resource of approximately 7.5 m/s.
The project is 10 kilometers from a 240kv transmission line with available capacity.
Halkirk wind project will provide substantial economic benefits to the County of Paintearth and east central Alberta with new jobs, increased tax revenues and royalties to landowners.
Once the project is operating, landowners with turbines would benefit economically, with each turbine requiring about two acres for siting and accesses, he said.
Property owners would get compensation for their land out of use, and they would get royalties based on the amount of money the project generates.
Greengate initially filled an application with the AUC for the project in February 2009.
Since then, the AUC conducted an extensive review of the project’s participant-involvement program, environmental impact assessment, potential visual and noise impacts, proposed gathering system routing, potential impacts on pipelines and other pre-requisite project approvals.
Winds of change in green power
Electricity from pressurized gas could do away with power lines, firm says
By Dave Cooper, Edmonton Journal
When the wind blows power flows, but what if electricity could still flow when the air is still?
Storing energy has long been a dream of wind-energy producers hoping to supply a consistent source of green power to the electrical grid -- without using expensive batteries.
A Nisku firm thinks it has the answer, a revolutionary concept that could change the face of energy distribution.
Lancaster Wind Systems says by turning wind energy into hydraulic power, inert nitrogen gas can be compressed in thousands of kilometres of unused pipelines across North America -- creating a sort of giant pressure tank.
Wind turbines would add pressure to the network, and small electricity-creating turbines tied into the system would draw off that pressure, producing power in a closed-loop system right where the electricity is needed.
"You might have 200 generators in a major city, each in the 1.5-megawatt to four-megawatt range. And since the nitrogen is returned to the pipeline, there are no emissions," said Dave McConnell, president and CEO of Lancaster.
He thinks electricity transmission lines will one day be a memory, with the continent's energy moving around as pressurized gas. The project has attracted funding from the Sustainable Development Technology Canada fund, and also raised millions from private investors.
With 18 patents already filed and more on the way, Lancaster has a working one-megawatt wind turbine producing hydraulic power, and plans to open a pilot project this summer in which 42 minutes of energy will be stored in a short pipeline section. A major pipeline company is supplying the material.
A wind turbine today is basically blades turning a shaft in a generator unit that creates electricity, with all the heavy equipment at the top of a strong mast.
Lancaster has turned that around. Its unit acts more like a windmill, with a lighter mast supporting the blades and hydraulic tubing, and the heavy equipment on the ground.
Currently the research focus is on details of transferring the energy to storage.
"That is where we are at, the mechanism of transferring this energy into a vessel. We can't talk about it, except that when the fluid comes down it is under pressure," said Arnie Barr, a field supervisor.
McConnell points out there is no hydraulic fluid in the storage system; it is simply moved into a tank and then sent back up the mast to be recompressed by the power of the wind.
"There is a pressure exchanger to convert the energy in the (hydraulic) fluid into the storage medium (nitrogen gas)," he said.
And that is about the limit of what Lancaster will say.
"There is a lot of concern about intellectual property. People drive in here and we kick them out. We have never spoken of this system to the media before," McConnell said.
However, he will discuss the turbine system, which is now fully patented.
All wind-power units today must govern their turbine speed in an effort to produce the appropriate 60-hertz supply frequency required by the power grid.
But because Lancaster is capturing energy in hydraulics and not directly producing electricity, this is not an issue. It can take all the power of the wind at any time of the day or night, and create its electricity at a steady rate.
"We aren't trying to restrict ourselves by feathering our blades. We don't care if the wind goes up or down, we don't have to worry about fluctuations. We just take the energy and store it," said systems analyst Terry van Gemert.
After a lifetime in the offshore-oil business, McConnell said he returned to Canada with the idea of buying a couple of drilling rigs. But then he had a better idea.
"The oilpatch is all feathers and chickens (bad and good years). My forte is hydraulics, and I spent time in Europe in the 1990s, where they are very concerned about green energy."
McConnell said it shouldn't be a surprise that Lancaster staff are oil people, as are most of the backers.
"The reality is the change in public thinking. Just look at Texas," which has 20 times more wind power installed than Alberta, as well as most of the U.S. petroleum industry.
"They will be one of the biggest players in green energy.
Fighting a wind farm
By Brenda Kossowan - Red Deer Advocate
Published: October 23, 2009 7:16 AM
More names are being added to the list of people taking legal action to stop a wind farm from being built near their rural homes.
Earlier this year, farmers around Huxley and Trochu learned that FPLE Canadian Wind, an Ontario-based subsidiary of Nextera Energy Resources, is making plans for the Ghostpine Wind Farm in Kneehill County.
Located on the west side of Hwy 21, the system would require up to 54 wind turbines to generate 81 megawatts of power.
The issue has formed a rift between rural residents, including those who support the program and have signed deals to accept them on their property and those who are opposed to having the turbines erected near their homes, says Kneehill County Councillor Ken Hoppins.
As one of the farmers who has signed a deal with the wind farm, Hoppins excused himself from debate when the project went to the county’s municipal planning commission to seek a development permit.
Since then, the development permit has been issued and the county has amended its land-use bylaw to allow the project, Hoppins said.
But while some are in favour, a growing number are expressing concerns about the potential health effects of noise and vibration from the turbines.
Calgary lawyer Gavin Fitch notified the Alberta Utilities Commission this week that two more families have joined the three families who hired him earlier this year to take action preventing the company from erecting towers near their homes.
Their letters of objection have been placed on file with commission as part of the application process.
However, the company has not yet made a formal application, said Jim Law, an external affairs and communications officer for the commission.
Current Alberta power production:
1st column is Maximum Continuous Rating
2nd column is Total Net Generation
3rd column is Dispatched (and Accepted) Contingency Reserve
Coal 5893 5093 0
Gas 4838 2727 155
Hydro 869 94 273
Other 264 192 0
Wind 563 17 0
TOTAL 12427 8122 428
Wind contributing a whole 17 MW at this moment.
http://ets.aeso.ca/
The windmill madness continues
By Will Verboeven - Stettler Independent
Published: October 07, 2009 11:00 AM
Updated: October 07, 2009 11:22 AM
Some time ago I commented on the bogus nature of the rush towards wind power by means of constructing more and more unsightly eyesore wind mills. A observant reader noted that there is some irony in my anti-windmill comments, being that my ancestry is from a country that built its very existence and vast prosperity, 400 years ago, on wind mill technology of the day. Well they did, but they were wise enough to switch to steam power as soon as it became available due its consistency and reliability.
Although, being Dutch, they preserved a number of those old wind mills for the purpose of harvesting millions of tourist dollars. I could only hope that history will repeat itself and a couple of the behemoth windmill monstrosities that exist today will be preserved soon as monuments to human folly and a waste of taxpayer dollars. But I digress.
Perhaps political-correctness with wind power has reached new heights of absurdity with recent TV and print advertising by the City of Calgary. Those advertisements trumpet the goal of the city in becoming the first in Canada to obtain all its public power requirements from sustainable wind power.
City politicians and senior bureaucrats were no doubt congratulating each other for such an environmentally brilliant achievement. The truth be known the only thing they achieved was bamboozling the city taxpayer by paying a premium for green power they don’t get and insulting the livelihoods of thousands of tax-paying citizens.
I have noted before that most wind power produced in southern Alberta is sold to the BC grid at a discount because our own grid can’t handle the wide fluctuations in electrical supply produced by wind mills. Besides, windmills produce only 30 per cent of the time. Both of those factors would see that almost zero wind power would actually reach the city of Calgary for which it pays a premium. No wonder utilities and commercial wind power companies are falling over themselves selling wind power at a premium to gullible consumers. You get to overcharge for a commodity that you do not have to deliver. In fact, you get to substitute much cheaper coal-fired electricity. What a boondoggle and it’s perfectly legal.
The real travesty with the city of Calgary wind power boondoggle is this - I would suspect that wind mills provide almost zero to the city’s tax base. Wind mills aren’t built in Calgary, most are manufactured in faraway China, Denmark and Germany - no taxes of any kind from those places. Those big wind mill farms are all located in the south of the province, so there are no property taxes to be gleaned for Calgary. Yet the city harvests millions of tax dollars from an industry that could produce electricity much cheaper and much more reliable than wind power - but it’s an industry the city disdains and dishonors with its untruthful advertising.
Thousands of Calgary citizens and businesses derive their living from the natural gas industry. Those same citizens and businesses pay countless millions of dollars of taxes of every kind, - a considerable chunk of which ends up in the coffers of the city of Calgary. Without batting an eye, Calgary city politicians and bureaucrats turn around and spend those hard earned dollars from the natural gas industry on expensive wind power that they actually do not receive. Did I mention that those tax dollars are also spent subsidizing the capital expenditure of wind mill farm construction?
So let’s see - our genius city politicians, instead of supporting a local industry that pays taxes and supplies cheap reliable electricity, would rather use tax dollars to support foreign manufacturers that don’t pay city taxes and support a wind power industry that produces electricity that is expensive and unreliable for which the city pays a premium.
What an insult to the thousands of tax payers who derive a living from the natural gas industry. You would think the city would support its own citizens first rather than use their tax dollars against them on bogus green power schemes.
But there is some irony to all of this and it’s all part of the wind power madness. The more wind power that comes on stream, the more natural gas fired electrical plants we need. That’s because wind power is so unreliable that these plants are needed for backup when wind power dies. It’s probably why utility companies aren’t crying too much about wind mill subsidization - they have a vested interest in more wind power - in fact, in many cases they are partners or owners in those ventures. At the end of the day, it would seem the power users get screwed either way. Think about that as you pass by those environmentally sustainable politically-correct wind mills.
Modified engine 20% fuel, 80% water.
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=es&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://hydronica.blogspot.com/
Bay of Fundy's waves to be put to work
Nova Scotia, Ottawa grant environmental clearance for three firms to undertake turbine tests
Oliver Moore
Halifax — From Wednesday's Globe and Mail Last updated on Tuesday, Sep. 15, 2009 11:06PM EDT
The first of three turbines is expected to go into the Bay of Fundy next month in spite of concerns raised by some local fishermen after the government approved the initial phase of a tidal energy project.
Nova Scotia's Minister of the Environment, a long-time fisherman himself, acknowledged those concerns and admitted that the possible effects are unknown. But Sterling Belliveau said the only way to identify problems is to start installing turbines and monitor closely the result.
“These questions are only going to be addressed [if] you have a demonstration project,” he said Tuesday after approving the trial based on an environmental assessment.
“I think you basically cannot sit in a conference room and get the answer to that, you have to go out in the real life, in the real world.”
A full-scale tidal energy project, if viable, would involve hundreds of turbines and could produce about 100 megawatts from the bay's huge tides. That would be 10 per cent of the province's energy needs, but such a system is years away.
The demonstration phase of the project, involving three turbines, is expected to cost $60-million to 70-million. Each of the three companies involved – which will co-operate on environmental monitoring and onshore development – intends to test a different type of turbine.
Minas Basin Pulp and Power will suspend its equipment between the bottom and the surface. The turbine will float until the best current is found and then be fixed to the bottom with anchors. Company vice-president John Woods said yesterday that his firm aims to have the turbine operational this time next year.
The president of Clean Current, a British Columbia company, would not comment yesterday on the project. Earlier information from the company suggested it would use a turbine designed to rest on the seabed.
The model chosen by Nova Scotia Power is similar. About six storeys high, with a turbine 10 metres across, it will use gravity to stay still underwater. This design is expected to be in place first, with the turbine going into the water late next month. It will not initially feed power into the grid.
“It's really a big science experiment,” said David Rodenhiser, a spokesman with the utility.
He said more than 200 turbines could follow, but that the company must assess the first one's effect on its surroundings, and how well it stands up to the environment it is placed in.
The unknowns are what worry some fisherman. Lobsterman Mark Taylor, president of the Heavy Current Fishing Association of Hall's Harbour, not far from the proposed sites, has expressed concerns about the effects on local catches.
“Two hundred machines in that area could mean that fishery is lost to us,” he said earlier this year.
Mr. Belliveau stressed that, under the terms of the environmental assessment approval, the companies must establish a monitoring body that includes stakeholders and keep close watch on the effects of the project.
“There's a number of questions, anywhere from salmon to plankton to herring and migrating whales, all [these] questions will be addressed,” Mr. Belliveau said, emphasizing that he would revoke the project's approval if significant environmental damage is found.
“I have the authority to stop [it] as simply as walking over and turning off that light switch,” he said. “And I would not hesitate if the science and adverse effects was there. I know that body of water and I understand the importance of getting this right.”
Garbage in, energy out
The plasma-gasification system at Plasco.
Shawn McCarthy
Ottawa — Last updated on Friday, Aug. 21, 2009 08:16PM EDT
On a hot summer day, the air hangs heavy inside Plasco Energy Group Inc.'s hangar-like building on the outskirts of Ottawa, with the pervasive stench of garbage more suggestive of a town dump than a leading-edge technology centre.
Municipal garbage trucks – diverted from the city landfill across the road – dump their loads of solid waste on the concrete floor, where a front-end loader moves the garbage into a shredder that also removes metals for recycling.
The shredded waste is then pushed into piles where it can be fed onto a conveyor belt that delivers it to the company's patented plasma-gasification system.
In harnessing that energy, Plasco chemically transforms Ottawa's residential garbage into a synthetic gas that is used to generate electricity – without emitting greenhouse gases. The process also produces some commercial byproducts such as sulphur, water and solid aggregate.
It's a 21st-century form of alchemy: garbage in, energy out. In a time when municipalities are desperate to reduce greenhouse gases and relieve overflowing landfills, gasification has the potential to be a world-changing technology.
But as with many green energy technologies, success depends on another modern dark art: raising capital.
If Plasco doesn't succeed on that front, it won't be for lack of trying. For the man in charge is Ottawa's most battle-scarred serial entrepreneur, Rod Bryden, late of SHL Systemhouse Ltd., Kinburn Technologies, WorldHeart Corp. and the Ottawa Senators.
But Plasco's technology has run into some serious glitches, which have hindered the company's ability to raise money.
Mr. Bryden, 65, is undaunted. “We believe that our manufactured product can be the most commonly used method of handling waste in the world.”
The landscape is littered with technologies that promised breakthrough advances in efficiency or environmental benefit, but failed to clear commercial hurdles. And it's already been a long haul for Plasco.
Five years ago, the company's founders, including current executive vice-president Christopher Gay and chief technology officer Andreas Tsangaris, realized they needed a savvy business partner and turned to Mr. Bryden for help.
The high-profile entrepreneur and civic booster was still recovering from a bruising battle in which he was forced to place the NHL's Ottawa Senators into bankruptcy protection, sell his controlling stake and cut a deal with creditors to avoid personal bankruptcy.
Mr. Gay, who was Plasco's CEO at the time, recalls that former Ottawa mayor Bob Chiarelli and local MPP Richard Patten put him in touch with Mr. Bryden, who has long been one of the city's leading venture capitalists.
In their first meeting, the veteran businessman seemed less than impressed, telling Mr. Gay “things that appear too good to be true usually are.”
Three weeks later, they met again, and this time, Mr. Bryden offered to work for a few months as acting CEO until he could make a proper assessment of Plasco's potential. But first, he had to clear up his own finances from the Senators' mess.
At an age when many Canadians are easing into retirement, the New Brunswick-born lawyer still relishes the challenge of building companies that bring innovative and socially beneficial technologies to market.
In addition to Plasco, he is chairman of a small biotechnology firm, PharmaGap Inc., that is developing new approaches to cancer treatment, and of Clearford Industries Inc., which is working on advanced waste water collection systems.
“It's much more satisfying to provide some leadership in making things happen which you can honestly feel that if you don't do it, it wouldn't get done, at least not right away,” Mr. Bryden says. “I'd rather do that than compete for the opportunity to do something where, if you don't get the job, somebody else will, and the job will get done anyway.
“I like doing things that I'm really proud of doing ... something that you would be quite proud to tell your kids: I did that, I helped make that happen,” he adds.
In that category, he includes his successful battle to keep the Ottawa Senators in the nation's capital, even though he ended up losing control and much of his personal fortune in the process. (The team is now owned by Eugene Melnyk, who made his fortune at drug manufacturer Biovail Corp.)
Mr. Gay said he was not bothered by Mr. Bryden's very public financial setbacks. “We were fortunate to be able to attract someone of his calibre,” he said.
Indeed, managerial weakness is a leading cause of mortality among startup technology companies whose founders – usually engineers, as at Plasco – insist on trying to build the business themselves.
And despite a reputation for sometimes overpromising, Mr. Bryden clearly knows what it takes to build a successful technology company, although his own career has also seen some high-profile failures.
“Plasco required somebody that could roll up their sleeves and work the company through the permitting process, introduce it to investors, get initial capital into the company, and then grow the company to the point where it could raise significant capital,” says Dan Phaure, an investment banker with Toronto-based Jacob Securities Inc., which has participated in Plasco financings.
“There wouldn't be very many people in Canada aside from Rod who would be able to do that.”
Quest for capital
The global waste-to-energy market is booming, though many municipalities are opting for older incinerator technology that raises pollution concerns.
Governments are looking to generate power from renewable sources in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to divert garbage from landfills, where tipping fees are expected to climb dramatically as available land becomes scarce.
Despite recycling efforts, North Americans currently throw out the equivalent of 99 million green garbage bags a day. The energy content from virtually all of that material can be recovered in the form of electricity, steam or even ethanol.
Plasco's quest to capitalize on all this dormant energy initially focused on tapping the federal government's Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) fund, which provides early round, pre-commercial funding for promising technologies that are potentially profitable.
A key moment came when the SDTC staff concluded their review of Plasco's application for funding in 2006 and decided to recommend it to the board. Even before the board approved a $9.5-million grant, investors took their cue from SDTC's due diligence process and agreed to finance the Ottawa demonstration plant, Mr. Bryden says.
The demonstration plant started operations in July, 2007 – and almost immediately ran into problems. The sorting and conveyor system simply couldn't handle the volumes of garbage required for a commercial operation.
In December, 2007, Plasco announced it had a new largest shareholder - First Reserve Corp., a Greenwich, Conn., private equity fund that specializes in energy. First Reserve invested $35-million (U.S.), leading a syndicate that contributed a total of $54-million (U.S.).
On top of that, First Reserve committed an additional $110-million to be invested over the course of 2008, as Plasco met performance targets. But the targets weren't met and that money never came.
Mr. Bryden says the lack of follow-up capital from First Reserve was not as critical as it might have been – the money would have been needed to build a commercial-scale plant, but Plasco couldn't proceed on that front until it ironed the wrinkles out of the demonstration plant.
The lack of capital and sales, however, forced him to lay off 53 workers in May, nearly a third of its employees. Critical work at Trail Road in Ottawa continued.
Mr. Bryden takes responsibility for the delay, saying he was focused on ensuring the plasma technology worked, and paid too little attention to materials handling.
“We underestimated the time it took to deal with the so-called simple stuff – the stuff that isn't rocket science,” he says. “Some of it is rocket science, and that worked. But it was a much more time-consuming process than we expected to integrate that into a real functioning system.”
Now the CEO insists Plasco is ready for prime time.
Since March, the materials feeding system has functioned smoothly, allowing the company to increase its waste handling by 43 per cent in the second quarter. The energy conversion unit has also performed well, and Plasco last week was rated top performer among nine waste-to-energy competitors by the California municipality of Salinas, which is prepared to enter contract discussions with the company.
To proceed with commercial plants, the company is deeply reliant on the health of capital markets, and the re-emerging appetite among international investors to plow money into unproven technologies.
Indeed, Plasco's business plan is predicated on taking the risk off the shoulders of its municipal partners, who will not contribute to the capital costs.
Instead, the company would tap the capital markets for project financing. To persuade investors, Plasco needs agreements with municipalities to obtain feedstock at a set price, and indications it will be able to sell the power to local electricity companies at the premium prices available to renewable-energy developers.
The problems at the Ottawa plant forced the company to delay its planned construction of a $96-million commercial plant in Alberta's Red Deer County, where a consortium of nine municipalities had agreed to provide land and deliver waste for a tipping fee of $60 a tonne.
In the current environment, public money is critical if Plasco is going to meet its ambitious targets, according to Mr. Bryden, who says investors are now demanding government support for capital-intensive, renewable-energy projects.
Plasco has applied under the federal “green infrastructure” program for financing of the Red Deer project and the CEO is hoping for an answer within weeks.
Although the company has tapped international investors for the vast majority of the $120-million it has raised in the past five years, foreign investors will be reluctant to finance 100 per cent of projects in Canada when refundable tax credits or grants covering 25 per cent of such projects' capital costs are available in the United States and Europe, Mr. Bryden says.
“It is unlikely a Canadian project will be built without a capital contribution from government, so long as other countries are routinely providing support for the same types of projects,” he says.
If it can get plants operational, Plasco will benefit from a different type of government support - the higher power rates being offered to renewable-energy producers.
Ontario's new feed-in tariff system, as yet not finalized, promises developers a high price for their power. Plasco also expects to generate revenue by selling carbon offsets, which are tradable credits created by renewable-energy projects that displace coal- or gas-fired power.
‘Holy grail technologies'
Plasco is just one of the many companies racing to mine the gold in garbage. Montreal-based Enerkem Inc. is partnering with the City of Edmonton to build a waste-to-energy plant that will produce ethanol. Calgary-based Alter NRG Corp., which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange, has two gasification plants operating in Japan, and is negotiating to build one in Ontario.
“It is one of those holy grail technologies,” says Rick Whittaker, vice-president of investments at SDTC. “Gasification is a technology that can take virtually any feedstock in, avoids all those air pollution problems you find with other technologies, and pulls off a very clean gas you can use to generate electricity.”
Gasification is a low-emissions method of extracting energy from a range of feedstocks, from coal, to forestry wastes, to municipal solid waste.
Incineration occurs in the presence of oxygen, which creates carbon dioxide, a key culprit in climate change, but gasification uses high temperatures and airless chambers to break down molecules into hydrogen and carbon monoxide, which are then reformed into a synthetic gas.
Plasco's innovation is the use of a plasma, an ionized, superheated cloud akin to lightning and often referred to as the fourth state of matter. Plasco's plasma torches efficiently break down molecules into basic elements, that are then reformed into synthetic gas that is used to power generators.
Mr. Bryden insists the kinks in his company's technology have been worked out, and Plasco is ready to build in Red Deer, pending a decision on federal funding.
The company is also in the final stages of negotiations with the City of Ottawa for a commercial plant that would divert as much as two-thirds of the city's non-recyclable, residential garbage to a waste-to-energy plant that would generate 24 megawatts of electricity, enough to power a small town.
Ottawa City Manager Ken Kirkpatrick says Plasco's technology promises a clean and efficient method of extracting energy from municipal waste. The city is not interested in incineration, which can also produce electricity but raises concerns about emissions, particularly of dioxins and furans.
Several municipalities in Ontario have energy-from-waste incinerators, and Durham Region has filed for an environmental assessment for a planned 400-tonne-a-day incinerator to be built by New Jersey-based Covanta Energy Corp.
While incineration is controversial, Durham's Commissioner of Works, Cliff Curtis, says all emissions will be well below provincial standards, which he described as the toughest in the world.
Durham spent some time looking at Plasco's technology, but the company simply wasn't ready for a commercial project when the bids went out. “Conceptually, it is quite attractive,” Mr. Curtis says. “But as a municipality, we don't want to gamble with taxpayers' money. We wanted something that works, and we couldn't afford to wait.”
His colleagues in Ottawa believe the wait may be just about over, though they're not convinced yet. Mr. Kirkpatrick, for one, wants to see the demonstration plant function smoothly for another month before taking the proposal to city council.
“It is world-changing technology, if it can be viably commercialized,” he said.
Caldera sees growth in geothermal energy
Plans 2009 IPO
Reuters
July 9, 2009
Caldera Geothermal Inc., a geothermal exploration company, aims to go public as early as year-end as it seeks capital to grow in the budding alternative energy sector.
Caldera's comments came as Canadian geothermal company Magma Energy Corp. (MXY/TSX-V) raised $100 million in an initial public offering that closed on Tuesday and showed new renewed optimism in the sector that has been hobbled by the credit markets crisis.
"We are seeking capital now to acquire" new properties, said Richard Zehner, president of Caldera. "We aim to go public by the end of the year or in the first quarter next year." Executives at the Toronto-based company said they are working on a private placement led by Foundation Markets, a Toronto-based boutique investment bank and company shareholder, as they seek capital to buy new geothermal properties.
Geothermal and other renewable energy sources are being tapped as part of an effort to meet growing global electricity consumption with power sources that emit less carbon dioxide than fossil fuels such as coal or oil.
Geothermal energy taps into heat sources typically situated near geological fault lines to heat water to operate power generating turbines. Underground temperatures can range from slightly below room temperature just below the surface to more than 5,000C at the Earth's core.
Proponents say that unlike solar or wind generation, geothermal power provides uninterrupted electricity supply 24 hours a day.
Canada's alternative energy sector is showing signs of a budding recovery as companies resurrect financing deals and public offerings that withered in the credit markets crisis. The sector is also getting a boost in the United States under the Obama administration's stimulus plan that includes provisions such as a tax credit for new geothermal power plants through 2013.
Mr. Zehner said the company's strategy is to seek out new promising geothermal projects in the western United States to develop, put into joint ventures or sell off to power producers.
About one-third of the world's geothermal power is situated in that region and was discovered during oil and gas exploration projects. Caldera has one project in Nevada with the potential to produce between 19 megawatts and 49 megawatts of power.
It hopes the private placement will help it identify and acquire four or five others in the near term, and that going public will allow it to expand around the end of the year.
The costs of bringing geothermal-generated power online are seen between US$3-million and US$4-million per megawatt.
"We are going grassroots, where no one else thinks these projects are," Mr. Zehner said.
Wind farm myths and realities
Published: March 25, 2009 10:00 AM
Updated: March 25, 2009 10:22 AM
Ahead of the heard
By Will Verboven
Recently an Irish company announced that it was proposing an $850 million wind farm for southern Alberta. To those true believers in alternative renewable energy this would no doubt be greeted with self-righteous glee - once again showing that even in oil and coal favoured Alberta - politically-correct concepts can win. But as with everything else there is more to the story and as a taxpayer you are not going to like the conclusion.
Firstly, wind power promoters always fudge the figures when it comes to the amount of power that these projects allegedly will produce. This most recent project is supposed to generate 350 megawatts - that would be a significant output but that is only in theory.
The fact is there isn’t a wind power facility anywhere in the world that consistently produces anywhere near its theoretical capacity. The actual output is closer to 20 to 30% of designed capacity. That’s because you can’t count on the wind to be reliable. Much of the time there is either too little or too much wind and the windmills are shut down. Anyone within sight of a wind farm already knew that of course.
But capital investment in wind farms is based on full capacity - to compensate for the difference between fact and fiction - governments provide tax breaks and grants to wind farm projects. It gets worse - because wind farms produce unreliable intermittent power, the power is difficult to handle on the provincial grid which requires a steady predictable supply.
What Alberta utilities have had to do is sell wind power to the BC grid at high discounts, apparently the BC grid can better handle fluctuations in power supply. Ironically Alberta utilities have to buy power back from the BC grid at peak times - but at full price of course. To compensate for that pricing gap - governments try to force consumers to pay premium prices for wind power they never really receive. Governments also force utilities to buy wind power at a premium - the cost of which is then paid by all consumers.
That situation doesn’t just happen here in Alberta. Denmark is touted as being the wind power capital of the world. Apparently up to 25% of that country’s electrical needs is met by wind power. But that as it turns out is actually just theory and fudging of the facts. A report on that production noted that only 20% of the actual wind power generated was used in Denmark. The rest, you guessed it, was sold at discounted rates to the German grid. The Danes in turn bought the rest of their electrical needs from German coal-fired plants.
The Europeans also seem to have come to their senses about the realities of wind power. They are reducing or eliminating their subsidies. That has resulted in industrial-sized 50 wind mills being de-commissioned in the Netherlands. New wind mill projects are being cancelled. The Europeans have come to realize that windmills cost too much too build; are very inefficient compared to other electrical generation; they are an environmental disaster causing the deaths of countless thousands of birds and bats; and finally they are noise and sight polluters. The latter is becoming a major issue as citizens and landowners don’t want these giant eyesores ruining the landscape.
The eyesore issue has some irony. Governments everywhere go to great lengths to ban billboards along highways because they are considered a distraction and a blight on the scenery. Yet they approve wind farms which feature giant-sized industrial wind mills which exacerbate what they are trying to do by banning billboards. It boggles the mind but then wind mills have the advantage of being politically-correct and they are the darlings of duplicitous green groups.
That leads us back to the announcement of an $850 million wind farm project by an Irish company. Well hold onto your wallets poor bedraggled taxpayers. The reality is that European windmill companies have found that they have run out of sucker governments in Europe. Subsidies are disappearing and business has crashed over there - but wait there still seems to be some dumb governments left in the world.
Those governments still blinded by political correctness are still all too willing to provide subsidies and grants to build giant wind farms - well guess what - those European vultures are more than willing to separate taxpayers over here from their dollars. They will want to get these projects going soon - it will probably take our politically correct governments another ten years to figure out what the Europeans have already found out - windmills don’t work and are unsustainable. Contrary to that old Bob Dylan song - the answer is not blowing in the wind!!
http://www.albertalocalnews.com/stettlerindependent/community/null_41835912.html
Power to the people – with pellets
NEIL REYNOLDS
Globe and Mail Update
March 18, 2009 at 6:00 AM EDT
Sweden is the world's No. 1 producer of wood pellets (1.6 million tons a year) – and the world's No. 1 consumer (1.7 million tons a year). Although Canada is the world's No. 2 producer (1.4 million tons a year), it is an almost negligible consumer (300,000 tons a year). Canada, in other words, exports most of its wood pellet production, some of it to Sweden. The question is: Why? The answer is simple. Europeans are far ahead of Canadians in exploiting (according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) “one of the cleanest-burning, most-renewable energy sources in the world.”
Technically, wood pellets are amazing things. Manufactured from sawmill waste (mostly sawdust and shavings), they produce heat and electrical power at less cost than fossil fuels, require no cutting down of trees, support domestic economies, emit zero particulates, are fully “Kyoto-compliant” – and contain no artificial additives. (Compressed into tiny, pencil-thin pieces of wood under high temperatures, pellet technology needs no glue to hold them together.) Europe has adopted advanced wood pellet technology in a big way. Finland's production of pellets reached 330,000 tons in 2007, an increase of 70 per cent from 2005. The country expects to hit one million tons a year within the next two years. Germany's production (900,000 tons a year) will increase this year alone by 30 per cent. Russia's production has risen from 50,000 tons in 2005 to 550,000 in 2007. Europe's consumption of wood pellets now exceeds six million tons a year – three times North American consumption. (Vapo, the biggest pellet producer in Finland, says 400,000 tons of pellets a year generate electricity for 100,000 detached homes.) In its March issue, Renewable Energy World magazine reports that Upper (northern) Austria, a region with 1.4 million people, now gets 40 per cent of its home heating from renewable energy, mostly wood pellets. The region's energy agency co-ordinates the operation of 148 private pellet companies with 4,500 employees and revenues of €1.6-billion ($2.6-billion). The European Union expects Europe's pellet industry to create 300,000 new jobs in the next decade.
A pellet-fuelled central heating system can completely replace oil or gas furnaces – as they have, for example, for more than 800,000 Italian homeowners. These systems are fully automated, moving pellets from storage bin to furnace as directed by the homeowner's thermostat. Typically, in Europe, a tanker truck fills up the backyard storage bin once or twice a year in a convenient, dust-free delivery service. The homeowner needs only remove residual ash from time to time – three ounces per 40 pounds of pellets (ash that many people spread in their gardens). Otherwise, pellet-heat requires no manual labour.
But European countries, more and more, are using wood pellets to generate electricity, especially to substitute for coal in large power plants. Belgium, the Netherlands and Britain all have such operations – helping to supply heat and light to millions of homes. These plants consume enormous quantities of pellets, the supply of which eventually will be limited. When you run out of waste wood, you run out of pellets. Thus the public policy question is whether to allot pellets primarily to residential purposes or primarily to industrial purposes. The world is still a long way from “peak pellet” but temporary, regional shortages can send prices skyrocketing from time to time – much, for that matter, like oil.
Nevertheless, wood pellet biomass makes an important contribution to the supply of renewable energy in Europe. Stavros Dimas, Environmental Commissioner of the European Union, reports that 11,500 biomass installations have generated 260 million tons of CO{-2} credits. The EU now supplies 4 per cent of its electricity from wood waste – and expects this percentage to double by the end of 2010.
Ontario is far, far behind. The province did call last year for “expressions of interest” from companies interested in getting supplies of wood wastes to exploit pellet technology. This belated, faint-hearted initiative aside, the province has failed to exploit pellet technology – an assertion inadvertently documented by an Ontario Power Generation (OPG) manager who told an energy conference last year that the province's major power utility only started to test biomass (in a single coal-fired plant) in 2007.
OPG has since conducted “aggressive testing programs” of wood pellets in all its power plants – with good results. “We can't believe,” the OPG manager said in a report, “how easy it was.” This is a thoroughly embarrassing confession, placing the wood-rich province a decade or more behind Europe.
One Canadian study, indicates that 70 per cent of the money that people and governments spend on wood pellet heat stays within the region – compared with 10 per cent of the money they spend on oil heat. Every province could profit from this finding but Ontario could profit the most. The economic crises at GM and Chrysler couldn't be averted. The economic crisis in Ontario's forest industry – starving amid plenty – is optional.
I am all for new ways to be green and this is one of them. We need to get on the bandwagon with getting more ways to be energy efficient.
I am all for new ways to be green and this is one of them. We need to get on the bandwagon with getting more ways to be energy efficient.
Home power systems set to become a consumer choice
Firm promises to take your lighting needs off the hydro grid forever
Scott simpson
Vancouver Sun
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Consumers looking to tap into green energy -- and cut their BC Hydro bills -- can find some solutions at this week's wind energy trade show in Vancouver.
Evergreen Technologies of Vancouver promises to take your home lighting needs off the Hydro grid, forever, with combination solar panel-wind turbine units that take advantage of the low energy draw of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in lieu of incandescent bulbs.
Evergreen already has a pilot model of its industrial-sized unit powering a 200-watt LED street light at Richmond's Gary Point, and several municipal governments are looking at the technology.
Company director Geoffrey Smith admits the units aren't yet cost-effective for residential applications -- but they soon will be as Hydro moves towards a new "distributed generation" policy that allows customers with their own green energy generation equipment to sell surplus power back onto the Hydro grid.
Utilities such as Ontario Hydro, and nations including Germany, are already paying more to consumers for the power they generate at home than they charge them to buy it off the public grid.
Smith said a package including turbine, solar panel, electricity storage battery and related equipment "can cost anywhere from probably a low of $7,500 up to a high of $15,000-$20,000 depending how elaborate you want to go with your lighting, and so on."
He expects the technology, and the generating systems, to show up first in new homes, which can be wired specifically to separate lighting from the Hydro system that will still be needed to run large appliances.
"The gold standard is going to be providing LED lighting in the interior of your home. Then you can run all your lighting off the grid if you want to."
Wind energy projects face a global shortage of turbines
More projects mean higher demand for equipment
Scott Simpson
Vancouver Sun
Friday, October 17, 2008
Canada's booming wind energy sector is becoming a victim of its own success, says a spokesman for the Canadian Wind Energy Association.
A global surge in wind energy development is making it difficult for proponents to secure equipment for new projects, and waiting times for turbine blades and other components are increasing.
"Right now there is a shortage of turbines internationally," David Huggill, western Canada policy manager for the Canadian Wind Energy Association, said in a recent interview.
"There is a finite number of companies that are actually producing the technology."
Within Canada, a federal program providing a penny-per-kilowatt to green energy producers has touched off another kind of scramble, as wind power proponents across the country vie to take advantage of $1.5 billion in available funds.
B.C. is the last major Canadian province to join the fray, most notably with the EarthFirst Canada wind farm now under construction in northeast B.C.
EarthFirst expects to begin shipping electricity onto the BC Hydro grid in January, making it the first B.C. wind farm in commercial production.
It is likely to be recognized next week at CanWEA's annual conference and trade show, which is taking place in Vancouver.
"B.C. is currently a net importer of electricity and the province's energy-plan call for self-sufficiency by 2016 certainly plays very well into renewable generally -- and wind's hands in particular," Huggill said.
Huggill added that CanWEA members plan to be aggressive, rather than passive, in moving the industry forward.
Canada now has 14 times as much wind-energy capacity, as measured in megawatts of electricity generated, as there was in 2000. But that's just a drop in the bucket -- amounting to one per cent of total annual Canadian electricity production, CanWEA calculates.
A vast landmass and lengthy coastline mean Canada has "more top quality wind sites than it could ever use," the association notes in a recent Canadian wind resource fact sheet.
The federal government has provided some assistance in supporting expansion of the industry -- through a four-year, $1.5 billion ecoEnergy program for renewable energy that pays green energy developers one cent per kilowatt to make them competitive with large-scale gas, coal and large hydro utilities.
Response from wind and other green energy sectors has been tremendous, Huggill said.
The program began in April 2007 and "we are anticipating that the money will dry up before the end of 2009. It was set to go until 2011."
"There has been so much interest and so much activity that those funds will be fully allocated two years ahead of schedule."
A cornerstone event at the CanWEA conference, which starts Sunday and runs to Wednesday at the Vancouver Convention and Exhibition Centre, will be the release of a strategic plan calling for continuation of the ecoEnergy funding through 2014.
"We are not advocating wind over all other renewables but I think there is a very strong case to be made that in the short- and near-term wind certainly provides a very viable option to meet those renewable targets that everybody is focusing their attention on," Huggill said.
Maple Leaf Reforestation creates energy subsidiary
2008-08-27 09:07 ET - News Release
Mr. Raymond Lai reports
MAPLE LEAF REFORESTATION INC. CREATES CHINESE ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SUBSIDIARY
Maple Leaf Reforestation Inc. has created a separate wholly owned foreign subsidiary, Maple Leaf Energy China Ltd. Initially, this subsidiary will manage the development of the company's Xinjiang Yellowhorn biofuel project, which is developing more rapidly than anticipated. Also along these same alternative energy lines, the company is currently reviewing opportunities for involvement in other energy-related initiatives. All such further energy-related developments and projects of the company will be managed by this subsidiary.
According to the Energy Information Administration (a U.S. government agency), China is the second-largest consumer of energy after the United States. Since 1991, energy consumption in China has grown at a compounded rate of 10 per cent and is projected to continue growing at a rate of 5 per cent per year through 2030, almost twice the global growth rate. There is continued strong market demand for energy throughout China. The Chinese government is especially supportive of new products and technologies designed to increase the efficiency of the energy industry and decrease environmental damage caused by energy production and consumption.
Raymond Lai, president and chief executive officer of Maple Leaf Reforestation, stated: "Maple Leaf's diversification into the Chinese energy sector is very timely, given the continued and growing demand for energy throughout the country. The company intends to offer technologically advanced, cost-effective solutions and products to Chinese oil and gas producers and distributors. The combination of the company's geographical knowledge, operating experience and significant regional support in China should lead to solid growth in this sector. Our proven ability to develop and market environmentally friendly and superior products should provide Maple Leaf with the competitive advantages required to be a true energy sector market leader in China. We are very excited about launching this initiative and confident in its success!"
We seek Safe Harbor.