InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 100
Posts 5820
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2008

Re: Srchn41 post# 66

Friday, 12/06/2013 2:27:24 PM

Friday, December 06, 2013 2:27:24 PM

Post# of 115
Had not seen SVFC answer but had seen the complaint & correction. That is why I say the transfer agent is in on it. What we believe we are buying i.e. the Nevada shares is not what we have been sold i.e. the NY shares. This is fraud plain and simple. How can you incorporate in different states and lead investors to believe they are buying shares from the state you list your incorporation from i.e. Nevada. This case is the first exposure of shares from NY and not Nevada.

By the way I see you are being attacked again on the other board, that is exactly why I don’t bother with the stupidity; just think what they would do to me if I posted my thoughts on that board. This is also what I was saying about the Nevada shares , they are the ones that count and IR knows it and that is why they wanted paid in those shares, they knew what is going on .

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.