SureTrader SureTrader
Home > Boards > US OTC > Banking and Finance > Freddie Mac (FMCC)

1. Then monesthind responds with" I can't refute

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (2) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
brandemarcus Member Profile
 
Followed By 20
Posts 722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/12
160x600 placeholder
Advertisement
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are a step closer to issuing a combined mortgage-backed security "Dow Jones News" - 5/15/2015 10:41:07 PM
Fannie, Freddie on Track to Issue Single Bond "Dow Jones News" - 5/15/2015 1:30:19 PM
These 3 Stocks Could Kill Your Portfolio "The Motley Fool" - 5/12/2015 1:12:02 PM
Judge Rules Against Nomura in FHFA Suit "Dow Jones News" - 5/11/2015 5:20:09 PM
Profits Down for Fannie, Freddie "Dow Jones News" - 5/11/2015 11:40:08 AM
Are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Headed for a New $157 Billion Bailout? "The Motley Fool" - 5/8/2015 9:30:02 AM
Fannie Mae Profit Drops "Dow Jones News" - 5/7/2015 9:00:46 AM
Bank of America Paid $315 Million to Settle With Banks Over Ocala Losses -- Update "Dow Jones News" - 5/5/2015 6:47:07 PM
Regulator to Allow Review of Freddie, Fannie CEO Pay "Dow Jones News" - 5/5/2015 9:50:12 AM
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Rating Reiterated by Zacks (FMCC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/30/2015 4:40:28 PM
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Stress-Test Results Released "Dow Jones News" - 4/30/2015 12:30:25 PM
Avoid These Stocks at All Costs "The Motley Fool" - 4/24/2015 8:10:13 AM
Bank of America Appeals $1.27 Billion 'Hustle' Penalty "Dow Jones News" - 4/22/2015 5:40:08 PM
Bank of America Appeals $1.27 Billion 'Hustle' Penalty "Dow Jones News" - 4/22/2015 5:30:08 PM
The Government Might Leave Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Alone "The Motley Fool" - 4/17/2015 12:07:02 PM
U.S. Fixed Mortgage Rates Edge Up "Dow Jones News" - 4/16/2015 10:50:16 AM
Fannie, Freddie to Lower Fees for Some Borrowers--2nd Update "Dow Jones News" - 4/15/2015 6:22:52 PM
SEC Settles With Former Freddie Mac Executives "Dow Jones News" - 4/15/2015 8:24:38 AM
Bove takes issues with Carney view on Frannie "Seeking Alpha" - 4/10/2015 12:26:33 PM
Carney: Grassley letter not indication of support for GSE lawsuits "Seeking Alpha" - 4/9/2015 9:37:23 AM
Rooftop Solar And The $55 Billion Wake-Up Call "Seeking Alpha" - 4/5/2015 1:43:22 PM
Fixed Mortgage Rates Rise in Latest Week "Dow Jones News" - 4/2/2015 11:00:07 AM
A Step in the Right Direction for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Shareholders "The Motley Fool" - 4/1/2015 8:09:01 AM
New Metric Aids Weak Credit Risks "Dow Jones News" - 4/1/2015 12:42:08 AM
Plots & Ploys "Dow Jones News" - 3/31/2015 7:24:53 PM
brandemarcus   Thursday, 07/18/13 01:11:30 AM
Re: Demar post# 27668
Post # of 39968 
1. Then monesthind responds with" I can't refute your facts but my propaganda will win the political contest so too bad"

2. The biased survey Monest hind keeps using told those polled that fnf had cost the taxpayers 189 billion . They conveniently forgot to mention that 130 billion has already been paid back and by 2014 the taxpayers will net cost will be zero and going negative. Public opinion changes quickly when that happens and so does the politics. Jack Lew has already changed his opinion to no comment. Again this is why Corker and Hensarling are in such a hurry because they no the jig is up once net zero is reached.

3. The higher the earnings the quicker net zero is reached and the sooner the politics changes. That's why the earnings are so important despite the fact that all earnings go back to the government for now.

4. Even better news came out today when Mark Warner stated that no Democrat can support the Hensarling plan. This means further delay while the anti-fnf forces try to get their act together and more time for fnf to reach net zero and political turning point.

5. The treasury has never said exactly that they want to shut down Fannie and Freddie. They have only said that they want to wind down the held portfolio to 250 billion and increase guarantees to reduce fnf market share. They always add the qualifier that they want to make sure fnf do not rebuild capital and come back in prior form. That holds out the possibility that they come back structured in a different way.
This is all in the white paper that treasury released in 2011.


6. As an example: The treasury could stop taking dividends into the general fund when net zero was reached and put the funds into dedicated capital reserve fund. At the end of 5 years enough funds would accumulate that fnf could come back needing much less government support. The portfolio would be wound down and the companies would not be in prior form. The jr pfd and the common would still be quite valuable and the treasury goals would still be followed. The taxpayers would make a bundle since the 189 billion would be totally repaid plus the treasury would still own 80% of the new company through the warrants. This is pretty close to the plan advocated by Jim Millstein who was involved in the payback plan for Aig.

7. Even if none of the politics changes, the treasury now has too win 5 lawsuits and more are coming every week. Even if Bob Corker is too dumb, Jack Lew will soon see it's a win -win for the taxpayers to proceed with plan similar to the one Jim Millstein outlined and get rid of the legal problems.



Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (2) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist