Fidelity SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US OTC > Delisted > Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

First In Last Out

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
cabot b shaw Member Profile
 
Followed By 0
Posts 7
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/13
160x600 placeholder
Guard Shot Near Canada Parliament
Canada's parliament building and other government offices are locked down in Ottawa after an armed attack left at least one injured guard at the country's main war memorial.
More Top Equities Stories Of The Day
Hong Kong Protests Expose Differences in Local Media
FTSE 100 Climbs As Oil Stocks Advance
Correction to AT&T Earnings Preview Story
Airbus 'Actively Discussing' New A321neo With Airlines -Reuters
Stifel Financial to Hire Two Former Merrill Lynch Advisers
Five HP Executives Sell $12.3 Million in Stock -- Barron's
U.S. Stocks Gain, but IBM Weighs on Dow
EU Seeks Trans-Atlantic Air Pact Feedback
cabot b shaw   Monday, 01/28/13 11:22:52 PM
Re: wooden post# 59624
Post # of 60809 
First In Last Out

within a range, anywhere within a range, that should be what calypso controls--once inside a connection should be made if at all possible this seems to be a fight over who is master--quality control vs fcc regulations, on one hand quality control should lose outside range, in range the judge has ruled that quality control wins-- the problem is quality control is an averaged quantity that depends on statistics gathered about some threshold that is within range (if legal), in effect its mapping the boundry before it switches. as long as they are within threshold the log (bit rate error), about 1 in 1000000, maps back to a smooth quality control parameter ratio when inverted; this creates a cutoff that equates to an average distance hence first switch into wifi is distance based likewise last switch out is also distance based so it also infringes. if the call later switches back into cellular when deeper into range then quality control takes on a different meaning and its this meaning that should be in dispute--not the first in nor the last out--it should be crystal clear to the court that the latter two are infringements, the myriad of former scenarios are merely a patch to compensate for an inferior implementation!

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist