InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 6369
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/10/2009

Re: None

Saturday, 09/01/2012 12:08:21 PM

Saturday, September 01, 2012 12:08:21 PM

Post# of 470921
FYI Republicans: Tocqueville Was Actually Insulting America When He Referred to It Being "Exceptional"

Chris Rodda
Senior Research Director, Military Religious Freedom Foundation; Author, 'Liars For Jesus'

If a drinking game had been made out of Republicans calling America "exceptional" at the RNC, the hospitals would have been full of people with alcohol poisoning this week. Unfortunately, and a bit embarrassingly, what these exceptional Americans don't seem to realize is that the term "American exceptionalism" actually comes from an insult to America, not a compliment.

Some may wonder how so many of today's Republicans latched onto this extremely popular "American exceptionalism" meme, so I'm going to tell you. It was popularized by everyone's favorite discredited "historian" David Barton, the same guy whose best selling book about Jefferson was just yanked by its publisher because it was so inaccurate.

I don't know exactly when Barton began spewing this "American exceptionalism" thing, but I know he's been using it for at least six years. In the Summer 2006 issue of his WallBuilders Report, Barton attributed the term "American Exceptionalism" to Alexis de Tocqueville, the Frenchman who was sent to America in the 1830s to report on America's penal system, but ended up staying for several years studying all aspects of American life. The result of Tocqueville's travels across America was, of course, his famous work Democracy in America.

Here's what Barton wrote in 2006:

"This Fourth of July, America will celebrate its 230th birthday. Neither our closest allies nor our fiercest enemies have experienced the stability with which we have been blessed. In fact, during the time that America has flourished under the Declaration of Independence, France has had fifteen different governments. And Brazil has had seven since 1822; Poland, seven since 1921; Afghanistan, five since 1923; Russia, four since 1918; and the story is similar for other nations throughout Europe, Africa, South America, and the rest of the world.

'Some describe this remarkable achievement as "American Exceptionalism" - a term coined in 1831 by Alexis de Tocqueville, a famous French visitor to America who penned the classic, Democracy in America. As De Tocqueville expressed it:

'The position of the Americans is quite exceptional, and it may be believed that no democratic people will ever be placed in a similar one.'
"

For years, Barton has incessantly repeated this Alexis de Tocqueville "American Exceptionalism" claim in his writings, videos, presentations, and radio and TV appearances. And thus it became a Republican talking point.

But what the Republicans don't seem to know is that Tocqueville was insulting America when he called it exceptional, not giving us something to be proud of. Making this even more ironic is that what Tocqueville was actually referring to when he wrote of the "exceptional" nature of America was the prideful nature of Americans.

Here's what Alexis de Tocqueville actually wrote. He introduced his opinion that America was "exceptional" by saying that Americans didn't have any original thoughts or advances in science, literature, or the arts because they relied on the thinkers of Europe:

"At the head of the enlightened nations of the Old World the inhabitants of the United States more particularly identified one to which they were closely united by a common origin and by kindred habits. Among this people they found distinguished men of science, able artists, writers of eminence; and they were enabled to enjoy the treasures of the intellect without laboring to amass them. In spite of the ocean that intervenes, I cannot consent to separate America from Europe. I consider the people of the United States as that portion of the English people who are commissioned to explore the forests of the New World, while the rest of the nation, enjoying more leisure and less harassed by the drudgery of life, may devote their energies to thought and enlarge in all directions the empire of mind.

'The position of the Americans is therefore quite exceptional, and it may be believed that no democratic people will ever be placed in a similar one. Their strictly Puritanical origin, their exclusively commercial habits, even the country they inhabit, which seems to divert their minds from the pursuit of science, literature, and the arts, the proximity of Europe, which allows them to neglect these pursuits without relapsing into barbarism, a thousand special causes, of which I have only been able to point out the most important, have singularly concurred to fix the mind of the American upon purely practical objects. His passions, his wants, his education, and everything about him seem to unite in drawing the native of the United States earthward; his religion alone bids him turn, from time to time, a transient and distracted glance to heaven. Let us cease, then, to view all democratic nations under the example of the American people, and attempt to survey them at length with their own features.
"

He then went on to conclude from his observations that Americans of the time had an altogether undeserved feeling of pride in themselves and their country:

"The Anglo-Americans are not only united by these common opinions, but they are separated from all other nations by a feeling of pride. For the last fifty years, no pains have been spared to convince the inhabitants of the United States that they are the only religious, enlightened, and free people. They perceive that, for the present, their own democratic institutions prosper, whilst those of other countries fail; hence they conceive a high opinion of their superiority, and are not very remote from believing themselves to be a distinct species of mankind. Thus, the dangers which threaten the American Union do not originate in diversity of interests or of opinions; but in the various characters and passions of the Americans."

But now, thanks to the Republicans' favorite pseudo-historian David Barton, "American exceptionalism," a nineteenth century insult about the undeserved prideful nature of Americans is being proudly touted by Republicans everywhere. The irony is killing me.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-rodda/fyi-republicans-tocquevil_b_1847387.html


David Barton's pants are on fire...


Long time ally of Rock Beyond Belief, Chris Rodda is in the middle of a press storm again. She is the author of Liars For Jesus, which explains the relatively recent phenomenon of history revisionism in the name of Christianity. David Barton is the worst offender, and bears the brunt of the majority of her assault.
He is guilty of quote-mining and using out of context historical references, or shockingly just outright lies about our nation’s history. He wants Americans to ‘know’ that the nation was founded on Christianity. He is able to find several obscure and often second-hand references to the founder’s private letters, sometimes with single sentences that suit his needs. This is of course while he leads his readers along in Olympic-level mental gymnastics, overlooking the mountain of documentation contrary to his version of history...

...The inexplicably successful disinformation tactics Barton employs are put to shame in Rodda’s book, Liars For Jesus. But with this particular round of resurgent publicity, Chris Rodda had an epiphany.

YOU CAN NOW DOWNLOAD HER BOOK, LIARS FOR JESUS (PDF), FOR FREE: .http://www.liarsforjesus.com/downloads/LFJ_FINAL.pdf

She writes on Ed Brayton’s ScienceBlog, Dispatches from the Culture Wars:

"A few hours ago, I was about to sit down at my computer to do my usual thing — write about the Daily Show interview, and debunk the specific lies that Barton was able to get in. But instead I found myself staring at the big Ben Franklin poster on my wall, and changed my mind. Sure, I could write about the particular snippets of disinformation and dishonesty that spewed forth from Barton during this particular interview, but what good would that do? Been there; done that. Then, staring up at the face of Ben Franklin, it was his words, “Do well by doing good,” that suddenly popped into my head.

“Do well by doing good” — the words of a man who could have become outrageously wealthy by patenting his inventions, but decided to just let everybody have them for the public good — have now been stuck in my head for hours, and aren’t going to leave until I do what I’m about to do — give my book away for free.

Can I afford to do this? No. Do I need to do this? Yes! Will lots of people download it and read it? I have no freakin’ idea. It’s just what I need to do to be able to look Ben Franklin in the eye on that poster on my wall.
"...

http://rockbeyondbelief.com/2011/05/08/david-bartons-pants-are-on-fire-for-jesus/

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.