Home > Boards > US OTC > Basic Materials > Liquid Metal Tech (LQMT)

You state:

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
watts_n_a_name Member Profile watts_n_a_name  
Friday, May 25, 2012 1:45:43 PM
Re: PaulApples post# 7685 Post # of 27198 
You state:

Quote:
1. The fact that they dodge any Apple questions is a good sign. There are under NDA and any hint of disclosing information would not be good for them. So if there is any disappointment that there was no mention or hint of Apple it is because of their NDA. Apple could very well still use their technology.




The objections raised about the Conference Call had nothing to do with AAPL at all; rather the objections were the lack of discussion of the shipments of parts which later turned out to be "molds and prototypes".

Next topic:

You state:

Quote:
2. The CEO did mention in the CC that while they are not responsible for supplying parts, the CEO did say that they would receive royalties from any use of their IP. So, the Apple story could very well still be alive. That is what I would like to believe.




You incorrectly infer what the CEO did not imply.

Apple can use ANY part of the C.E. I.P. under the M.T.A. and has absolutely no obligation to render LQMT SQUAT.

Sorry, my friend.

It is one thing to mis-read an M.T.A. and another to assert that the mis-read is a fact.





Liquid Metal Tech (LQMT) Stock Trading Info:
Liquid Metal Tech LQMT Stock Quote Liquid Metal Tech LQMT Stock Charts Liquid Metal Tech LQMT Financial
Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist