Fidelity SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > Free Zone > Welcome to Investors Hub > Baseball Chat (BASEBALL)

Not the only one who went nuts last

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
excel Member Profile
Member Level 
Followed By 151
Posts 72,342
Boards Moderated 11
Alias Born 03/08/01
160x600 placeholder
Opec Members Nearing Compromise On Supply Cuts
OPEC members are inching toward a compromise that could lead them to cut oil supply, as the producer group prepares for one of its most closely watched meetings in years this week.
More Top Equities Stories Of The Day
Spotify's Revenue Rose in 2013, But Losses Continued - 2nd Update
Regulators Give Passing Grade to Wells Fargo Plan on Theoretical Bankruptcy -- Update
SEC Grants Bank of America Short-Term Waiver from Hedge-Fund Restrictions
Appeals Court Grants TV Programmers Stay in FCC Dispute -- Update
Telefónica Works to Redraw Its Empire
Canada Resident Caught Up in China Corruption Probe
Kinder Morgan Unveils $6 Billion Debt Offer -- Update
Correction to La Compagnie Fares Story
excel Member Level  Wednesday, 05/09/12 05:26:29 PM
Re: None
Post # of 155068 
Not the only one who went nuts last night watching the manager placing his players in a situation that wasn't best to win a ball game............

Mattingly and Wedge put on their teflon shields, pointed to the fact that managers have been doing this for hundreds of years, and laid the blame for these losses at the feet of their players. The problem is that they repeatedly took steps that made it less likely that their team would actually win the game, and had they just sat on their hands and done nothing, they would have had a better chance of congratulating their boys on a victorious come-from-behind win. Instead, they sat there and just waxed on about a lack of execution.

The only thing that needs to be executed is the sacrifice bunt from the playbook of Major League managers. It is not always the wrong move, but it is used far too often and in too many situations where swinging away is more likely to produce a positive result. At the front office level, every organization in the game is getting smarter. In some cities, the on-field personnel are utilizing facts and logic to better inform their tactical decisions. But, by and large, most Major League managers are still like Mattingly and Wedge, and they’re going to bunt regardless of whether or not it actually helps their team’s chances of winning.

We don’t live in 1953 anymore. We have access to more and better information than ever before. Teams are spending large amounts of resources to make better decisions to get improvements on the margins that may end up winning them one or two games over the course of the season. And yet, at the end of the day, most of these teams are still entrusting their in-game strategy to people who simply don’t understand the basic probabilities of the sport.

Maybe it’s going to take five more years. Maybe even 10 or 15. But at some point in our lifetime, teams are going to start hiring managers who understand that giving away an out should be a rare occurrence.

Bunting for a base hit, putting on a well-timed squeeze, beating an overshifted defense, having a pitcher move a runner into scoring position… there’s room for bunting in baseball. The frequency of sacrificing bunting that is prevalent now, though, is simply incorrect strategy, and the sooner it is removed from the sport, the better off Major League teams will be.

When Chickens are outlawed, only outlaws will have Chickens!
Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
Current Price
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist