oh not at all cyber. Completely untrue. Otc offers 7 explanations for the warning. Based on the FACT that the sec defined the suspension as a "lack of adequate and accurate public info, (ONLY)" and the FACT that Finra APPROVED a name /ticker change (where we know that the sec needed some questions answered) points me to a #5. #5 fits the bill beautifully to the farewell to Medlink and Anywhere Md and the new Mining Sector for the New Entity "Premier" (Finra approved ticker PIPI) PS, if there was fraud here, you would have NEVER seen a name/ticker change. Unless we want to go the silly Wells Notice route. I'd find it hysterical for finra to green light the change and then an SEC Wells notice to follow. lol.
1. Questionable Promotion — The security is being promoted to the public, but adequate current information about the issuer has not been made available to the public.
2. Spam — The security is the subject of spam promotion having the effect of encouraging trading of the issuer's securities.
3. Investigation of Fraud — There is a known investigation of fraudulent activity involving the company, its securities or insiders.
4. Suspension/Halt — A Regulatory Authority has halted or suspended trading for public interest concerns (i.e. not a news or earning halt).
5. Disruptive Corporate Actions — The security or issuer is the subject of corporate actions, such as reverse mergers or serial stocks splits and name changes, without adequate current information being publicly available.
6. Unsolicited Quotes — The security has only been quoted on an unsolicited basis since it entered the public markets and the issuer has not made adequate current information available to the public.
7. Other Public Interest Concern — There is, in OTC Markets' view, a public interest concern.
