InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,070.55
(
1.20%
)
US TECH 100
17,100.00
(
2.07%
)
Dow Jones
38,503.69
(
0.69%
)
Brent Oil
87.62
(
0.06%
)
Bitcoin
66,600.00
(
0.29%
)
Post# of 346914
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

loanranger

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 209
Posts 32090
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

loanranger

Member Level

Re: dalessan post# 337948

Saturday, 03/03/2012 7:19:16 AM

Saturday, March 03, 2012 7:19:16 AM

Post# of 346914
The IRS must be full of pranksters:
"must be claimed in the year that the criminal indictments are handed down"

Why allow the loss in the year that the criminals are ACCUSED of the crime, which is all an indictment is, when they have yet to be tried? How is that in any way connected to the timing of the loss? It doesn't even establish that there was a crime.

Anyway, you're right about the indictments having occurred in 2010, if that's really determinative.

I'm tryin ta think but nuttin happens......Curly

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up