Investors Hub Daily
|
Home
|
Log in
Boards
Stocks
Commodities
Forex
The Lounge
Hot!
Breakout Boards
iHub My Stocks Activity
Ticker Buzz Cloud
Top Boards
Most Read
Most Posted
Most Followed Members
Recent News
Active Boards
Site Stats
New Boards
Hot on StockWiki
Data Tools
Charts
Trader Alerts
Trades
Portfolio
Top Lists
News Alerts
Commodities
More Tools
My Image Gallery
Advanced Search
Videos
All News
Stock Screener
News Filter
Live Charts
Live News
Live Desktop
Forex Prices
Commodities
ETF Center
Online Brokers
Educational Channel
Streamer
Level 2
Home
>
Boards
>
Free Zone
>
A.I.M.
>
The Contrarian
In the case of Forbes Magazine, I've figured
Public Reply
|
Private Reply
|
Keep
|
Last Read
Post New Msg
Next 10
|
Previous
|
Next
PraveenP
Wednesday, December 22, 2010 10:15:01 AM
Re:
aim hier
post# 700
Post #
of
752
In the case of Forbes Magazine, I've figured out that the columnists are motivated to give good picks at good prices. They even publish how their picks did a year later (minus a certain % to simulate commissions, fees) vs. the S&P 500.
The readership of Forbes is skewed to the wealthy, and Forbes and the columnists make the big money and business contacts by hosting investor luxury cruises, etc.
So they are motivated to give good, timely picks because they want to attract wealthy couples and financial planners to their cruises and retreats.
That is why a billionaire like Ken Fisher bothers to write a column for them.
In a way, getting some picks from Forbes is a contrarian play, since the majority of magazines give picks after the stock is successful
Praveen Puri
Author of "Stock Trading Riches"
The Stock Trading Riches System
discussion board:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=19287
Public Reply
|
Private Reply
|
Keep
|
Last Read
Post New Msg
Next 10
|
Previous
|
Next
Follow Board
Keyboard Shortcuts
Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote
-
Discussion Board
+/- to Watchlist
© 2013 InvestorsHub.Com, Inc.