InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1472
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/01/2004

Re: easymedicine post# 197

Saturday, 01/08/2005 11:46:14 AM

Saturday, January 08, 2005 11:46:14 AM

Post# of 232
Note the 7:46 candle and the possibilities...........

surrounding the period. It has become common where rules are tested concerning boundaries. This once was not so. The E-Mini markets had greater volume and action reliability. It appears as though stops are being run in a Naz stock. As more and more E-Mini markets become open and available, volume in all disburses to the new and novelty markets. But if the general principles of the ball-trade method were incorporated for the period, boundaries would be 1570.50 and 1575.00. Using inside-out would have been 1573.00 and 1575.00 and a test of nerves would follow (although one might not trade at 7:46 A.M. - risk increases).

Ball-trade appears safer in more volatile periods while inside-out proves more rewarding if not stopped out.

Can volatility be quantified to determine which method should be used? I have read a few gurus saying nearly all meaningful price moves occur once a threshold range activity has been violated. In other words, and theoretically, MSFT will not print a substancial price move until it completes $1.91 in any one direction in a single action.

Do these methods have that theory covered in its operation? A quest, perhaps, now insues.

easy


There comes a time when you define the moment, or the moment defines you. - Tin Cup

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.