Fidelity SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US OTC > Miscellaneous > Mike The Pike Productions, Inc. (MIKP)

Here is my thought on what you are

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
ctp93 Member Profile
 
Followed By 25
Posts 5,988
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/16/09
160x600 placeholder
Mike The Pike Productions, Inc.'s ServeNation(TM) Files Non-Provisional U.S. Patent Application for Automating Charitable Don... "Marketwired" - 4/25/2014 4:44:23 PM
ctp93   Wednesday, 12/16/09 10:13:03 AM
Re: A deleted message
Post # of 88784 
Here is my thought on what you are saying. If you believe that MIKP is so fragile, that a post on iHub that "seems" detrimental can actually HURT it, then what does that say to you about the strength of the company you are putting money into?

Honestly. Step back and think about that for a second.

Some anonymous iHub poster opinion has the power to sway the market perception of a company? That is what you are saying.

The point here is that iHub appears to BE the only market for MIKP right now if that is true, and you guys are convinced it is.

WONDERFUL. You guys are finally starting to understand what I have been saying all along. It is useless for the MIKP iHub board to sit and trade each other shares!

The fact that what I say is detrimental and can cause harm to the PPS is a testament to my whole point...the point you have argued with many times (necessity for awareness). And of course, you guys have been telling me since day one that we didn't want any promo...blah blah...and that it was NOT a good move. Yet now that Mark has finally started to move on the issue (not because of me by any means), it is suddenly a great idea?

All along, I have simply pointed out the REASONS we trade the way we do in my opinion, and what I thought had to happen in order to make it go. Somehow you guys take that as bashing. You need to understand the difference between being critical and bashing.

Lynn has asked good solid questions here and been criticized the same as me for it. Imiola has made some significant points that have pretty much been proven to be dead on, yet he gets criticized at times as well. I don't consider either as bashing. Now, WeArWhAtEvEr and Biggerstff are just bashing. Fine...they have an agenda, and that is to take Mark down for anger over what happened at EESO. Some of you think that those guys just want to bring it down so they can buy it lower. I believe you are giving them too much credit in that regard. I think it is just pure spite and anger that causes them to act that way and that they are too clouded with judgment to even make a smart trade on it.

Bull, you have been backhanded in comments regarding MIKP several times, both as Bull and your previous alias. So get off your high-horse when calling someone out here.

I happen to know a a thing or two about the entertainment business that make this an interesting study for me. THAT is one of the factors that has kept me around here longer than I would have otherwise. When the Ft. Wayne play started to fall apart, many left. That may turn out to be wise on their part. I stuck around for other reasons.

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist