InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1565
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2006

Re: None

Saturday, 12/16/2017 3:52:55 PM

Saturday, December 16, 2017 3:52:55 PM

Post# of 6372
"fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me."

Up until recently, I also believed that the company's ability to raise funds supported my believe the technology was promising. I now suspect the reason why the company was given the recent cash dealt instead with the warrant issue and the registration agreement which perhaps allows the warrant shares to be used for any purpose including shorting. I hope I am wrong but my faith in the company to date has been proven to be unwise.

What if the recent funding relates to a plan by someone to short the stock after the reverse split?

With regards to the recent Stonegate Capital report, following the reverse split the company stock would have to reach $38.00 to meet their target. Highly, highly unlikely. That would mean a market cap of 450 million which has happened only once before since I invested. When we hit $5.25 previously, I now believe it was a run up prior to a short, much like the 3 bucks per share before the suspected "Russell short."

My hope was for a similar run up prior to a short following the recent deals but I see no evidence it is presently needed by the "shorters." IMO our foolish management team has done the work for the "shorters" with the reverse split. At $2.20 per share there is plenty of money to be made if the stock is shorted back down to $.22.

As for the company not releasing needed information because they refraining from "pumping" the stock price, keeping shareholders advised of the actual results of a trial is not "pumping." Saying you are ready to hire a CFO when, if in fact, you have no intention to do so, could easily be described as "pumping as could any of the unfilled projections made by PN.

Why does the company fail to issue a press release regarding perhaps significant company events? To save money? I SUSPECT BPTH spent thousands of dollars in travel expenses for management to attend these investor meetings without prior nationwide PR releases (I saw) to the general public. Does this make sense? What was the result, a lower stock price?

It is has become my opinion that unless the company's actions benefit PN financially or helps him keep control of the company, BPTH is "pennywise and pound foolish." This opinion is based on my interpretation the reverse split information, my evaluation of PN's compensation and the company's repeated failures IMO to meet projected timelines.

The above post represents my opinion only and is based on many assumptions that may not be factually correct. This post is not intended as financial advice. Do your research and come to your own conclusions. Finally, I hope I am 100% wrong with this analysis and the company has a cure for cancer, which is why I invested here in the first place.

I am not going to comment on these issues any further for now but will instead wait for results.

Prove me wrong BPTH! I would like nothing better.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BPTH News