InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 66
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/22/2017

Re: nyt post# 45307

Saturday, 12/16/2017 2:33:04 AM

Saturday, December 16, 2017 2:33:04 AM

Post# of 129533
That's better, simple and too the point.

Set a limit order sell, all or nothing, good till cancelled for $1.99.
That's the highest my broker will let me set a stock that's trading under a buck. This takes your shares out of the float, a added bonus for pps movement. And it makes it harder for you to do something stupid like selling...

Not fun reading the run on style writing. pro vplm?

Think apple throws the IPR first no matter what. This gives time for lawyers to strategize, assess damage control etc. Likely over 50% get thrown out, probably more like 90% IPR is in favor of the infringer... That's not the case here.

So, now what do you really think the lawyers are telling the executives? It's risk/reward assessment. I'd rather own the patents baby! and we do.

"Half of what?" Duh, royalties. Details we don't know. I only characterize and use an example for a baseline for deal making. We want the best deal and so do they. That's how it works. Ask for the high of what you think is reasonable, 10$ and the negotiation starts. Offer, counter/offer, adjust and renegotiate. Do I really have to spell everything out? I appreciate keeping the conversation going, but debating the unknown is frivolous. Point is patience. No whammies.

IMO