InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1018
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/27/2016

Re: lbcb123 post# 1584

Monday, 12/11/2017 2:43:09 PM

Monday, December 11, 2017 2:43:09 PM

Post# of 3754
I confirmed that they did NOT do as instructed by the SEC and they are therefore deficient in their filings and not qualified to be on the OTCQB. There was no amendment to the improper 10-K. Their next auditor relied on those filings that the SEC made very clear they could NOT and it was the responsibility of Dieter Sauer to inform them they could not rely on those reports:

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors andStockholders of Sauer Energy, Inc.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sauer Energy, Inc. as of August 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended August 31, 2014 and for the period August 7, 2008 (inception) through August 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As a reminder, this is what the SEC told Dieter Sauer personally in a letter placed in the public record:

"Please ensure that your current auditor does not express reliance on the work of your prior auditor in rendering an opinion on your financial statements."

This is the entire 10-K where you can confirm the new auditors relied on the information where the SEC made it clear they could not.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1446152/000150441214000355/seny10k8312014_10kz.htm