looks like they are going after twitter too...
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Other than noted below, there have been no material developments during the current quarter for our legal proceedings that were disclosed in our registration statement on Form 10 filed on April 22, 2016. For a full disclosure of legal proceedings, please reference our Form 10 registration or Note 12 of the Financial Statements contained in this report.
i) Voip-Pal.com Inc. v Apple, Inc. (Case No. 2:16-CV-00260) & Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Verizon Communications Inc., AT&T Corp. (Case No. 2:16- VC-00271) in the United States District Court, District of Nevada
In February, 2016 the Company filed patent infringement lawsuits in the United States District Court, District of Nevada against Apple, Inc, (Case No. 2:16-CV-00260), Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Verizon Communications Inc., and AT&T Corp. (Case No. 2:16- VC-00271). These cases are seeking a combined $7,024,377,876 in damages. On May 9, 2016, the lawsuits were officially served to these companies. The proceedings in these cases are currently stayed, by agreement with the parties thereto, pending the outcome of two Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”) (see Inter Partes Reviews below).
ii) Voip-Pal.com Inc. v Twitter, Inc. (Case No. 2:16-CV-02338) in the United States District Court, District of Nevada
During the period ended December 31, 2016, on October 6, 2016, the Company filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, District of Nevada against Twitter, Inc, (Case No. 2:16- CV-02338) in which Voip-Pal.com alleges infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,542,815 and its continuation patent, U.S. Patent No. 9,179,005, This case is seeking $2,699,256,418 in damages. On December 28, 2016, the lawsuit was officially served to Twitter, Inc. It is anticipated that this case will also be stayed pending the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“USPTO”) issuance of final written decisions in IPR proceedings concerning the patents-at-issue (see Inter Partes Reviews below). The outcome of each of the patent actions is undeterminable.
