Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[RussTheBus]

misread it. I see your math but this is just more anti-BTZO rhetoric. So you proved, that maybe GERS is long term entitled to more than BTZO based on ownerships. But you also proved FCC will have the most benefits from the settlement. So why aren't we touting how great a company that is? How that is where we should try to put our money? So the point is essentially, "see BTZO more like BTZ-NO" but what's the end game. Why discredit one company to credit another? GERS literally cannot benefit from the clarification on your post. It only serves to harm another stock.

Beyond that your math is largely flawed based on the fact that you and I or really anyone is incapable of accurately predicting how stocks will respond to this news.