UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[sexysamir]

Since there's been a lot of outrageous claims on the board here lately with no backing whatsoever I figured I should just go over everything that's been going on. DD seems to have been lost on this board so here is mine.

From the 10-K:
On 10/27/15 the company acquired 100 percent of Chanbond, LLC. Accordingly, filed lawsuits against the 13 largest cable MSOs in the country.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11200129


From the 8-K on 10/30/15:
“transferred and conveyed all of its membership interests in ChanBond to the Company and ChanBond appointed William R. Carter, Jr. (a related party to the Company) as sole manager (“Manager”) who shall have sole and exclusive authority over the business of ChanBond”. It was at this time that Carter took over the business operations of the company, he is responsible for funding the litigation. He also is based out of Dallas, TX. The office in Fairfax, VA was closed as the business operations at this location were ceased. They are 100 percent focused on the litigation.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10979018



From the 13-D:
Converted Carter’s Preferred shares to common shares giving him 903 million and some change shares of common stock. Also, bottom pages explain that the company is going dark and will not be filing as their sole focus is on litigation. This is where the suspension and delisting rumors get put to bed. This was filed through the SEC.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11010807



Litigation and IPR’s:
After receiving the lawsuits, both RPX and Cisco filed for IPR reviews of the patents. Both initial requests were denied by the USPTO.

RPX: https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/ptab-filings%2FIPR2016-00234%2F28

Cisco: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/chanbond-avoids-institution-six-cisco-ipr-petitions

Both companies filed for appeals, as we have discussed on the board lately, the oral hearing against Cisco, which is the last step in the appeal, was held last week. Cisco used the exact same defense as their first go around, many of us longs really like our chances here. We should be hearing the ruling here sometime in the next few weeks.

RPX’s defense is that the initial loss hurt their reputation as a company and therefore should be resubmitted. Again, us longs really like our chances with this one as well.
We have one of the top patent litigation law firms in the world representing us.

Carter has a lot of success in the world of patent litigation.
If you don’t think they’ll win their cases that’s fine, but enough with the uninformed posts.