InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 813
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2017

Re: None

Monday, 10/16/2017 12:19:07 AM

Monday, October 16, 2017 12:19:07 AM

Post# of 46195
Hard Truth and real Facts about WDDD

1. Dilution IS coming – READ THE LAST 10Q

a. Company states it itself – Default notes will be paid out via settlement which is no time soon so implausible or PUBLIC OFFERING = DILUTION

b. No evidence note holders are rolling over their debt – as the COMPANY ITSELF STATES OTHERWISE

c. The company only has 84k on its balance sheet- It will still need to pay the lawyers for the CAFC? How exactly can they pay with no revenue? Dilution!

d. How will they pay operating costs without dilution?

2. The market is not agreeing with longs, there are no institutions who want this 3 cent stock and think its getting 300 mil anymore. The ptab does what it does, it handicaps npes before the get to court, like it or not, that's what the AIA was designed to do, and it did it here.

PTAB killed WDDD’s valuable claims, that is what the market (via share price and no institutional buying post ptab), susman by going to the cafc are telling anyone who can read the tea leaves –that is the reality of what the market is indicating

3. Misinformation from another post

The noteholders, whose notes are in default, are shareholders and have it in their best financial interest, as shareholders, to avoid dilution of their own shares at any cost. A company doesn't have to hold your hand through its every future decision in a financial statement. Additionally, rolling over a note is a NOTEHOLDER decision, not a COMPANY decision. That's why it wouldn't be in a financial statement because it's not a decision the company makes.





a) The company SPEAKS TO NOTEHOLDERS - they explain what they want

b) The notes are in DEFAULT - the company explained what they plan to do with those notes in default yet everyone here wants to think the company is going to do something OTHER than what they state in their own filings? Notes being in DEFAULT are also a SIGN of financial distress, sure they have no revenues, but it also implies institutions are not willing to assist - it is a MATERIAL SIGN OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS- this also suggests BY IMPLICATION THAT GIVEN INSTITUTIONS WILL NOT ASSIST BY TAKING EQUITY TO TAKE OUT THOSE NOTES, THAT THOSE SAME PATENT INVESTING INSTITUTIONS DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE VALUE OF THE CLAIMS=FACT - and again the pps reflects this as well.

c) When the company states they will pay out the notes in their 10Q via a public offering or settlement (which is clearly not in the cards any time soon, thus public offering), this is WHAT THE MARKET IS BEING TOLD WILL OCCUR BY FACT - THE COMPANY STATED IT . WHAT PEOPLE HOPE FOR ON A MESSAGE BOARD DOES NOT CHANGE REALITY

d) There is no evidence note holders are shareholders and REGARDLESS PAYING FOR NOTES VIA DILUTION OR ROLLING THEM INTO EQUITY ARE THE EXACT SAME THING - THE COVERSION TO EQUITY IS DILUTION LMAO!


THE NOTEHOLDERS CAN THEN SELL TO GET THEIR MONEY BACK WHICH GIVEN THE COMPANY'S OWN STATEMENT IN THEIR 10Q THEY CLEARLY WANT

4. Finally, common sense here, a THREE cent stock would NOT BE TRADING AT 3 cents if it was due 300 mil or 1 billion!

a. How can a company that lost material claims still be getting billions, yet no smart money in the market wants the stock even AFTER IT GOT THROUGH THE PTAB?? Anyone suggesting as such is effectively saying all those claims they lost at the ptab had no value??? Ok lol

b. Well, IF THE CLAIMS THEY LOST WERE NOT MATERIAL, institutions would be piling in, the collective knowledge of the market would imply there is immense value here and thus the market would be buying lol. – see how that logic of they are getting billions and no institutions buying doesn’t hang together logically?

c. See how my logic makes sense if one is objective?

d. If WDDD were due billions with remaining claims why bother going to the cafc first? To get one billion and 4 dollars? Clearly if you have material claims left and only need 1 alive in court to get 1 billion dollars you just go straight to district court

e. Many here now arguing, oh well just trade ‘catalysts’ – seems this is the new strategy since no one can argue the logic of institutional non existence in this stock and the current share price -ie what the market is saying. Nice about face lol

f. If one is not investing because the company can extract value from the remaining claims then rolling dice it is! But do not conflate rolling dice with the constant arguments over claims have value claims have value! the market doesn't get it! the market doesn't get it.

5. Only thing left for WDDD is to pray they get material claims back from the CAFC - WDDD knows it, susman knows it.


This post is all factual information and common sense.

Best outcome for WDDD is that they get a large number of claims back from the CAFC- if not, this stock may actually sell off.