InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
4,967.23
(
-0.88%
)
US TECH 100
16,556.80
(
-2.24%
)
Dow Jones
37,986.40
(
0.56%
)
Brent Oil
86.63
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
63,367.40
(
-0.72%
)
Post# of 17377
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Sheepdog

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 103
Posts 43407
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 02/13/2010

Sheepdog

Member Level

Re: Nomad505 post# 15864

Thursday, 10/05/2017 10:33:31 AM

Thursday, October 05, 2017 10:33:31 AM

Post# of 17377

Reducing the number of tunnels from 60 to 40 dramatically increased the wind velocities in each tunnel. As velocity doubles, the kinetic energy available is cubed.

Wow. so if we reduce it to one tunnel we get another 40 times the velocity and can now produce a zigawatt of power??? And then add 40 turbines in line for another 8 zigawatts????

I'm in!!!

LMAO.....What a joke this thing is

I have no humble opinions, but I do have opinions and those are what I express in my posts. BUT...I have been wrong before and likely will be wrong again so do your own research and don't blame me if you are too lazy to do so.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up