Wednesday, September 20, 2017 10:47:52 AM
I agree mad, that was just an untrue statement.
I'll say it again, there is no possible way S&G expected >50% of the claims to be validated. They're not stupid.
Also - still haven't gotten a decent explanation of the timeline of WDDD. The stock was at $0.03 well before the PTAB ruling, and is still at $0.03. The market didn't react to the PTAB ruling at all besides a quick run-up. So "the market values the remaining claims at 0" still doesn't make sense to me. There should have been some sort of selling off after PTAB for that theory to hold weight.
Recent WDDD News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/19/2023 09:30:21 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/11/2023 06:34:14 PM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM