InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 733
Posts 75161
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/01/2012

Re: Corndog2hot post# 32550

Saturday, 08/19/2017 10:47:34 AM

Saturday, August 19, 2017 10:47:34 AM

Post# of 41768
The problem with your statement is you are basing a investment decision on Twitter posts.

Still not on Amazon - still not on Mr. Checkout.

Still no verification that Bethel exists except in BMXC press releases and 8-Ks. There are no management names or contact information available about Bethel - the contact email address was for another company mb@viscus.com.

Bethel has no business footprint other than BMXC.

The CEO promised no more toxic financing and in less than 2 months she obtained another $384,000 in toxic debt.

Then the CEO increased the A/S by 70% without informing the shareholders.

And the nonsense about building a manufacturing facility in Africa - what will she use to finance the project - more toxic financing.

You wrote: "For the future PPS, I think it will explode sooner than later. If she used her assets/inventory wisely she would have gained mass profits from the $1.1 million PO."

Why did the CEO use toxic lenders for $384,000 if the Bethel contract was real.

Why did BMXC have Net Losses of $1 million in the last quarter?

After all of the years the CEO states she has been in business - the Revenue for the last Quarter was a paltry $25,000?

Your cost analysis is based on wishful thinking and not facts. In the last 10-Q the the Revenue was $24,960 - but the COGS were $20,067 - the Gross Profit was only $4893. Keep in mind that to get the Profit/Loss from Operations is Revenue - (COGS + SGA).

The COGS are 80% of the Revenue.

IG

"Straight Facts Homey!"