InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 119
Posts 4079
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2002

Re: DangFool post# 366268

Thursday, 08/17/2017 7:51:51 AM

Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:51:51 AM

Post# of 380500

That is, did NTEK provide that piece of paper to Gulas to convince him that NTEK was legit, or did they provide it to him so that he, in turn, could try to convince Paramount not to pull their titles? In the latter case, maybe Gulas was aware of the deception, or maybe he wasn't. Either way, that's fraudulent, and the letter would represent forgery, to boot.



I agree with everything you've opined, DF (that is, the other DF!)

It certainly appears to me that those two "financing" related documents submitted by Dr. Gulas with his affidavit were forged.

I wonder if anyone has contacted Steven Orefice regarding the suspected use of identity theft.
http://linkedin.com/in/steve-orefice-a224a819

FORGERY

The crime of forgery generally refers to the making of a fake document, the modification of an existing document, or the unauthorized signing of a signature without authorization.

Elements of Forgery

Forgery involves a false document, signature, or other imitation of an object of value used with the intent to deceive another. Those who commit forgery are often charged with the crime of fraud. Documents that can be the object of forgery include contracts, identification cards, and legal certificates. Most states require that forgery be done with the intent to commit fraud or larceny.


http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/forgery.html


I think that the intent is quite clear...

INTRODUCING THE FOLEYTUBBIES IN "WHO STOLE THE MONEY?"


Doc



LEGENDARY NAKED SHORT SELLERS