Thanks for your review. I welcome both pos and neg comments as I look at as a form of peer review.
I will be formulating a response and include all my methods and data. The problem is the spreadsheets are massive and cannot be posted so I will use some links.
The tail of this model would have a higher uncertainty since I used the IMUC ITT (intent to Treat) survival curves as the initial basis of this model.
I have previously posted a review of the tail of the NWBO trial using a different method.
Please review this post. 121596
Still the model shows statistically significant survival improvement for the experimental arm