InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 4508
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/25/2015

Re: ref90210 post# 49556

Thursday, 08/10/2017 9:57:08 AM

Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:57:08 AM

Post# of 56559
Yes?

It's not worth continuing to consider the arguments with the elementary path these proceedings have taken, and given the sheer fact Plaintiff needed 5 months to file a 2-page response to a boiler plate Motion to Dismiss.

NGCG argues $101,000 of the convertible Notes which the case is based on are made out to Mighty Jaws, thus Mighty Jaws should've been included as a Defendant. Since they aren't, they suggest the case should be dismissed.

Ruppert responds Mighty Jaws was dissolved as a result of the 2014 Purchase Agreement between Monster, Mighty, NGCG, Cal et al. thus they can't be included, thus the Motion's moot.

Still have to set for hearing ... obtain court Order requiring NGCG to Answer complaint ... it's essentially a scratch off for Plaintiff ... if he wins ... great ... if not ... he pestered the $h*t out of em ... going nowhere