Another entire post without ONE court document to back up a word you say.....who would have thunk?
Let's start slow so you can grasp the concept.....you said...
"Even the 23d Civil court decision you posted as wet ammo; which ignored C-1912-2001 legal marginal annotation on title 2001 to date; was very successfully appealed and dealt with."
Please post the court document showing that it was "very successfully appealed and dealt with." Now do you get it? How do I just KNOW that your next post will still be nothing but words?? lol!
Oh....BTW....looks like MTSTACK proved you WRONG on EVERY account....take note.....THIS is how you do it......
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.