InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 7
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2017

Re: JerseyDrew post# 81

Monday, 06/05/2017 3:44:53 PM

Monday, June 05, 2017 3:44:53 PM

Post# of 105
I disagree.
The agreement that gave the $30,000,000 to the other insurance company is the same agreement PN had for years WITHOUT paying a cent. All of the sudden the majority shareholder of PN and owner of the company receiving the $30M (the majority shareholder and owner of the other insurance company are one and the same) decided to demand a payment of $30M for the same relationship PN previously had for no $. It is a $30M transfer just for the major shareholder of PN (owner of the company getting the money). There is no rational reason behind it other than to fleece and take $30m.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.