Well said - I'm not an expert and it's tough to say if it's legit
I will say i looked through some of the judges other suits, and they were handled pretty quickly.
However, UOIP's suit
, by the fact that it has a lot of activity and is drawing out, makes me think it is legit.
I saw depositions, as well as a trial scheduling date set for august.
Filed: 1/7/2016, Entered: None Court Filing
SCHEDULING ORDER: Case referred to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Joinder of Parties due by 6/2/2016. Amended Pleadings due by 6/2/2016. Discovery due by 4/10/2017. Dispositive Motions due by 8/30/2017. Joint Claim Construction Brief due by 9/23/2016. A Markman Hearing is set for 10/5/2016, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6A before Judge Richard G. Andrews. A Trial Scheduling Conference is set for 9/8/2017, at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 6A before Judge Richard G. Andrews. A Pretrial Conference is set for 1/5/2018, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6A before Judge Richard G. Andrews. The first Jury Trial is set for 1/22/2018, at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 6A before Judge Richard G. Andrews (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/7/2016. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00842-RGA et al.(nms) (Entered: 01/07/2016)
Possible settlement June 12th?
Tuesday, May 16, 2017
SO ORDERED, re110 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit a joint status report and proposed revised schedule to June 12, 2017. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/16/2017. (nms)
I took a small position in it given the players. All in my humble opinion.