Followers | 116 |
Posts | 11877 |
Boards Moderated | 1 |
Alias Born | 03/08/2004 |
Tuesday, May 09, 2017 4:35:34 PM
Either the patent was an asset in the bankruptcy or USPTO was a creditor.
I don't recall either being the case. (( That would suggest Toms River paid the fee and still owns the patent))
Toms River did have a lien on it many years ago, (See Below) and they were disclosed as a creditor, but I don't recall any valuation being put on this patent. Though Toms River's loan/judgement/settlement was secured with the patent, if the patent were worth BILLIONS as claimed, they are only entitled to the amount of the debt to them, not the whole booty.
Like if the bank forecloses on your house for 100k but sells it for $5 million. They don't get to keep the extra $4.9mm
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60967710
#1). You have money. Other people want it. All of it!
#2). You want easy money. So does everybody else. They'll get it, too....yours! (and all of it!)
#3). You tell yourself you're smart. You won't lose your money. Fact: Other people are smarter,
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM