It is clear SUPREME COURT and Constitutional rights will sink BCSC Barrick et al in Chile.
Supreme Court will have at last Barrick and ust lawyer defending two legal positions stances and judgments at SUPREME COURT one that the defendant and actor IS NOT KNOWN and at the same time EMPLOYEE in both cases 1995/2017
End of story the rest is garbage like the actor's deposition at C-1912-2001 that he is not known to Barrick. To sink MSX fortunes.
Acknowledged Barrick scaping to BC as Chile is out of bounds hah ha ha ha
Title Title title, Courts in first instance have a knack for NOT ASSESSING the evidence for the benefit of Barrick, SUPREME COURT has an appointment with the crooks and me.
C-1912-2001 BARRICK not knowing ITS MINA PASCUA THIEF 1995-2017
v.
23178-2014 Barrick PROVEN employer of ITS MINA PASCUA THIEF 1995-2017
The same chamber at the same time. Two VICTORIES one loser?
Time is the best judge and heals all wounds.
Barrick will bring sown Barrick at SUPREME COURT OF CHILE and Chilean constitutional charges are on the forthcoming.
By the way BCSC news in the horizon GET THE BIBLE & TOOTH BRUSH
Banks will be featured soon, NOT FOR THE GOOD REASONS as trials are under way against banks approved by Chilean Judicial Powers to me, as requested.
For the insulting losers, eat crow
