InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 287
Posts 21275
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 09/16/2009

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 298702

Sunday, 04/02/2017 12:16:03 PM

Sunday, April 02, 2017 12:16:03 PM

Post# of 312012

NON RETAIL has been UPSIDE DOWN on PTOI since they first illegally ran PTOI up in Dec 2009 ..



Well that cannot be, as the claim on it's own face fails due to the bullshit documentation presented here on a daily basis. So the claim is that the stock went to over $7 a share due to "NON RETAIL" and not the scam of credits improperly documented in a filing, one of 20+ documents filed in single day... hilarious.

But lets look at this ridiculous claim of upside down, so they ran the stock up approximately 740% in profits. Yet they are "upside down". The other part of the ridiculous claim is that they are shorting this all the way down so add another 99.9% of profit on there and yet somehow they are "upside down". So somehow out of 840% profit they are "upside down" in this security according to this new fascinating claim.

So then enter the other nonsense claim that to date not a single document has been provided showing an Abusive Naked Short position present here, but lets assume that it was real. So they have shorted in one claim 30 million shares into the market and somehow through magic they were able to get the cash proceeds of those positions without closing them out.. ever... yet again magic, so 30 million shares sold all profit as well and added 840% in gains and somehow these NON RETAIL are "upside down".

So lets go over that again, they made legal profit up to over $7 a share, made legal profit shorting down the 99.9% maximum gain, but the real catch is the supposed additional 30 million shares shorted illegally in a non existent open position that is documented to be in FACT 0 shares, but they are somehow "upside down".

Makes perfect sense. BA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.. snortle.

So either there is an "unawareness" to what exactly the term "upside down" means or yet again we are dealing with a made up condition that is based upon fiction. I am thinking both in this case.

Edit: I will change the time from December09 and just show that profit gain