InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 26
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/10/2017

Re: aileninvader post# 17688

Sunday, 03/26/2017 4:33:53 PM

Sunday, March 26, 2017 4:33:53 PM

Post# of 72986
I have no clue about patent law maybe you/someone can expand upon this: in vdrm' disclosure statement, it explicitly states that viaderma purchased the patent from Phillips. If visderma paid Phillips for the patent, it seems to me that it would be otikos at that point. Even if, hypothetically, Keough tried to take legal action as a "co-inventor" it seems to me that he would instantly lose the case. Think about it, how could Keough possibly argue that he assisted in developing the product as an attorney vs a phd scientist.. I guess he could say that Phillips signed the paperwork with Keough as an inventor but it seems like it would be pretty clear cut that Phillips is more likely to be granted patent rights, which were then transferred to otiko.