Mountainstar Gold Inc (fka MSX)

[Braelorne]

Aw c'mon Jorge... why do you continue to twist the facts? This statement of yours is simply untrue...

Note that BARRICK indicated 2011 that neither me nor MWR (MSX) today, had a REGISTERED interest in TESOROS concessions.

In reality,THIS is Barrick's statement straight from the link that you provided:

Neither Jorge Lopehandia nor MWR have a registered ownership interest in the Amarillos 1-3000 concessions or the Tesoro Uno 1-30 to Tesoro Doce 1-5 concessions.

registered OWNERSHIP interest.

The MTStack has provided a clear explanation of the facts:

The phrase that JL is struggling for is not "registered interest" (as he writes in his post today on IHUB or any interest whatsoever, as he has written previously), but

"registered ownership interest"   

which means that he is not registered as the owner of the Tesoro concessions.

Barrick has been totally truthful in their press release that JL/MSX have no registered ownership interest in the Tesoros.

HUL is the registered owner and is the holder of the Certificate of Domain of the Tesoro concessions.

The injunction was ordered to be lifted on September 2, 2015.  Barrick is no longer trying to lift the injunction, instead JL is trying to keep it in place.  It is a subtle difference, but significant.

http://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/c.mwr/mountainwest-resources-inc#kssulfVcGLS1uke5.99


Even YOU JRLopehandia, agree that the registered owner is Hector Unda Llanos:

a) UNDA LLANOS clean title owner at Mines Registrar 2016.

You're trying to have us believe that you're somehow connected to title ownership since your name appears as a sidebar note added to Unda Llanos' registered claims. Tsk, tsk... all you have is simply an affiliation with the originators of the injunction on the claims.

Also; what's the difference between Unda Llanos acting as the concession applicant on CMN's behalf, and Villar acting as the concession applicant on your behalf? You've asserted many times that YOU were the owner of the Amarillos Sur and Norte claims and that Villar was just acting as your employee.... which is no different than CMN (Barrick) claiming to own the Tesoros concessions and Llanos was just acting as their employee. And forget about spouting the nonsense that CMN said that he wasn't their employee, and then that he was their employee... that's all irrelevant because the court agreed with CMN in the end.

Seems to me that it's common practice to contract and hire local people to do the concession applications, and then transfer them once they're approved. If so, then it makes sense that Barrick considers themselves to be the beneficial owners of the Tesoros concessions. Just like you did with Villar and the old Amarillos Sur and Norte concessions (that HE sold to CMN) right?

Are you gonna pursue Villar after this whole saga with Barrick is over and done with?