InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 4022
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2003

Re: mlh1979 post# 13055

Friday, 03/03/2017 5:44:44 AM

Friday, March 03, 2017 5:44:44 AM

Post# of 33991
This deal with Protext makes no sense, but TXTM gambler do not tell this deal is in their highest interest - but not in the interest of PLPL shareholder: PLPL will not show revenues by SA products in their financial reports, but Protext will! So, how shall it be in our interest that PLPL will publish financial reports with reduced revenues - revenues are anyway near zero at PLPL since PLPL has been founded years ago !
Some people state a lot of nonsense to eyewash PLPL shareholder. The deal with Protex done by Duffield is in a not-visible financial interest of the management of Plandai: In the moment they did this deal and got shares by TXTM, Duffield did win by his exploding TXTM shares...... PLPL shareholder did win nothing...just check the PLPL chart...it is a dead duck, and Duffield helped to arrange it. This deal stinks - but of course not for TXTM gambler. Those, who are telling PLPL shareholder that this deal shall be great, are simply dishonest in their personal interest. One must be blind not to notice that ! Duuffield is not a friend of shareholder, this family suck shareholder - that simple.