Prism Technologies Group Inc fka PRZM

[KOmani]

You need to remember that in that case, Secure Axcess (Prism) was looking to overturn the decisions already made.

In my opinion, the courts do not like to overturn decisions already made. Whether it is by another court or some other government (or government like) entity.

Of course, "losing" the cases doesn't look good, but it does go with the idea that the appeals court doesn't like to overturn decisions.

This is why it is important to look at things like did the lower courts have some sort of Vendetta against Sprint (in the big case)?

If yes, perhaps the $30 Million award is not warranted.

Again, as I own shares I am biased. However, I don't see the real reason as to why the decision should be overturned.

Sprint and Prism took the risk of going to trial.

One side "won" while the other didn't.

The thing I don't like is Prism's attempt to get an even better outcome.

I understand that they can say it, but I think sometimes you should be quiet.