InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 60
Posts 2594
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/28/2008

Re: meikodog post# 46217

Saturday, 02/18/2017 9:57:53 AM

Saturday, February 18, 2017 9:57:53 AM

Post# of 54752
In the COR - Etrade litigation in New Jersey last year, COR made the following statement:

"In responding to E-Trade’s arguments, COR Clearing wishes to cite information derived documents designated as “confidential” and “highly confidential” in the underlying litigation. More specifically, the information COR Clearing now seeks to seal was produced by (or derived from documents produced by) the Depository Trust Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”) pursuant to a subpoena COR Clearing issued to the DTCC in connection with the underlying litigation. The DTCC designated the pertinent documents and information as “confidential” or “highly confidential,” pursuant to a Protective Order entered by the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska in the underlying litigation. "

------

So if the DTCC submitted documents in Nebraska and designated them as 'highly confidential', then by the definition imposed by Judge Strom, the DTCC believes that the 'Receiving Party engaged in fraudulent activity which caused harm...'

So once again, I continue to believe that this case will go to trial in September.