InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 1445
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/05/2014

Re: BasherCrashser post# 46057

Thursday, 02/16/2017 6:57:06 PM

Thursday, February 16, 2017 6:57:06 PM

Post# of 47873
Until we have the detail on how the committee was formed, I'm going to go ahead and assume they followed the law.

That is my point, you're trying to present this story that you have this special inside information. Based on how things normally work, it would be extremely odd for the type of coordination you suggested to occur. If I'm one of the top 7 shareholders here, why would I give my seat at the table up to someone else that I more than likely do not know (I'm sure you'll tell me they all know each other personally)?

It's okay to admit that you're just as clueless as the rest of us. Now you've embarrassed yourself and are coming up with some wild scenario where the largest shareholders who lost out here would not want to be kept up-to-date/involved with the decisions on what is going on with the EC.

I tend to look at what logically makes sense. It makes sense to me that a law firm is going to give a good deal to another law firm. That was my only point. You've taken it way beyond that.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.