Monday, February 13, 2017 2:09:34 AM
http://www.barrons.com/articles/BL-TB-54031
Gotta love that Fli's wireless charging solution does not expose users to radiation in the way that other approaches seem to -- even if those others say they're safe, which one would you choose??
Gotta also like that Fli's approach seems to offer more wattage than others => faster charging ...
Who doesn't prefer that??
I know, I shouldn't get excited about it.. it's way early and there's loads of competition and competing approaches.... then again there's over 1 billion smart phones, tablets, external batteries, and cordless devices in the US alone that could be charged this way... even if Fli captures just 5% of the market, could easily be worth FH's entire market cap IMHO
I'm probably missing something ... do your own homework please
You figure it out and then let me know ok??
FEATURED Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Name Change to NuVibe, Inc. and Initiation of Ticker Symbol Application Process • KGKG • Apr 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM