My Dilligence Conclusion:
I've been waiting all week for my answer, DD. I've asked twice. You said,
"Would you like to take some of your profits and roll them into another MJ play thats about .02, no dilution, no debt, profitable."
By your silence, I'm leaning heavilty to the conclusion that this was a rhetorical offer. That you can't produce this "profitable" 2-cent company with no dilution and no debt.
I'll give you a boring shampoo that is profitable, no dilution, and pays a 17% dividend. SPCO. More boring than the shampoo they sell! And it's dividend isn't competitive in today's oil trust environment, being that commodities are low.
However, I'm asking a THIRD TIME for this elusive 2-cent stock that's "PROFITABLE" has "no debt" and "no dilution." In the growing MJ industry, no less. What does it have? 1 billion shares to keep such a good thing down?
THIRD TIME is a charm, they say. I'm guessing more silence on par with Alan's research on Zac. In which case, I'l be forced to conclude that you were just blowing more hot air. All talk and and no corroboration. Man, why does it always have to be the ones that talk so much? You talkers give me a bad name. People are going to lump me into the all-talk category.
