If it goes to June that would indicate that the judge has reviewed our request for standing and has determined that we have a pretty decent case.
This isn't a simple lawsuit. The EC request is coming in conjunction with a BK case which means there is already a judge in place who will rule on the merits of the EC claims before allowing anything to move forward. He is a judge who is responsible for weighing the potential benefits against any future costs.
If he thinks we have no case, we will be shot down. If he allows it continue (to June and potentially beyond), that would indicate we have a case and that the potential for a settlement will rise exponentially.
I mean, this is me using simple logic, so I may be wrong. However, after reading all of the court documents, this is how it seems to be playing out to me. The same people who are saying things look "sad" are the same people who were saying PP is out for blood because their case is so solid. If that were true, why cancel the interest from Oct 2016 forward? A HUGE portion of their argument was the accrual of that interest and how it would negatively impact everyone involved.
