InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 150
Posts 7543
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/09/2013

Re: papa p post# 6177

Saturday, 01/21/2017 1:32:14 PM

Saturday, January 21, 2017 1:32:14 PM

Post# of 6854
No problem papa p and I appreciate your respect for other people.

I found where he changed it to "deleted post" and if he doesn't want to leave it up or better, sticky it, that just makes the validity of it questionable to the onlooker imo.

I myself have not been able to get a response to my questions but then again, I've been doing this for a very long time and know what buttons to push.

Though the catalysts that Ceek holds are excellent, right down to their partners including Google and Universal, the reality of it is NXGA has nothing to do with Ceek on paper anymore and own nothing except a deferred payment of $5.5 million Ceek owes them.

IMO it appears Ceek is racing against the clock and going to try and lead on shareholders until they get past the December deadline. They've done it for one year already, just 11 more months to go imo and the SEC won't look at it.

The problem Ceek faces which may be very beneficial for NXGA shareholders, is this wasn't your everyday run of the mill screw job by a pink sheet CEO filled with make believe products and contracts.

She literally walked away with contracts from Universal and EON and fulfilled them w/o one announcement to shareholders let alone written consent filed with the SEC of majority shareholders allowing NXGA to relinquish them to Ceek.

Just because her signature was on them, didn't make them hers, they belonged to and still belong to NXGA and their shareholders as far as I'm concerned. Which could mean any revenue earned from those contracts including any further work generated from the effect of those contracts, should belong to NXGA.

Let me ask you this, if Ceek was to be acquired by a billion dollar company or land a $100 million dollar contract, do you really think they will include NXGA shareholders or just payoff that measly debt of $5.5 million?

That being said, imo it wouldn't hurt for shareholders to reach out to the SEC to see where they stand on this. It's not like a company such as Ceek is created through a pink sheet everyday. The only two I can think of offhand are Chico's Fashions and Netflix, and both those companies took very good care of their shareholders and never abandoned them, even while their balance sheets were upside down during R&D.




I'm a non-professional individual investor who may own, not own, buy, or sell stock at any given time in any security ever mentioned in posts. I never accept compensation in any form to post. Always consult an investment professional when investing.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.