InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 305
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2014

Re: None

Friday, 01/13/2017 10:21:59 AM

Friday, January 13, 2017 10:21:59 AM

Post# of 46195
I could be (and frequently are) wrong here.. But aren't most investing companies kept from investing in companies under like $3.00 to $5.00 ? And the uplist isn't it normally a $3.00 number to keep the listing without having an issue of failing to comply with minimum pricing?... and if so, then the only way i see the R/S would be at a minimum of say at 20-1 would be say .15 to .20 that would put it at say $3.00 to $4.00 put then the balancing act of selling pressure because many are going to sell, then buy in at lower after R/S vs those that can then potentially buy in.... ok i am on board with that, but if that is the case i would think the first two of three catalysts would need to occur.. 1 run up in share prior to appeal 2- An appeal win and 3- at least one license/infringer paying or appeal win, otherwise the r/s uplist could not sustain itself and the price would only fall again anyway causing notice of failure to maintain price minimum causing a cascade of pricing downward pressure.

In my opinion a price of .25 to .50 will be hit prior to the r/s, just my opinion though...

Thoughts from the gurus of the board... DATASTREAM your thoughts...? is it close.