Monday, January 09, 2017 3:16:29 PM
Do you know that the above is not true for a fact? NO
Are you making an assumption that it is not true? YES
If that is the only instance that is propelling the bullshit claim that Norat is involved in the investigation it is pretty weak.
Again I ask, please present some proof that Norat in involved in the investigation into Natario with facts not mere ASSUMPTIONS.
Okay, since the SEC does not post its investigations until they make it public then how would you know Norat is involved, talked to, suspected or anything for that matter unless you are privy to the dialogue of an ongoing confidential investigation?
The fact is, you don't know. Just making an ASSUMPTION based on a weak hypothesis.
Coinllectibles' Subsidiary, Grand Town Development Limited, Acquires Rare Song Dynasty Ceramics Worth Over USD28million • COSG • Apr 18, 2024 8:03 AM
ILUS Provides Form 10-K Filing Update • ILUS • Apr 17, 2024 9:54 AM
Glucotrack Announces Expansion of Its Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology to Epidural Glucose Monitoring • GCTK • Apr 17, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment To Fire Up 24 New Stations in Louisiana • AHRO • Apr 16, 2024 1:30 PM
Cannabix Technologies Begins Certification of Contactless Alcohol Breathalyzer, Re-Brands product series to Breath Logix • BLOZF • Apr 16, 2024 8:52 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Acquires Surge Distribution LLC from Loud Beverage Group, Inc. (LBEV) • KGKG • Apr 16, 2024 8:30 AM