InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 2015
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/12/2013

Re: HopScotch2 post# 8088

Tuesday, 12/06/2016 8:21:28 AM

Tuesday, December 06, 2016 8:21:28 AM

Post# of 13735
New "Post of the Day"

Allow me to correct a few incorrect statements:

Ref posts #8088 and #8097:

You state "ROTH is misleading investors by saying it is in "Good Standing" with the FDA". Roth never made this statement, but I did. I am just a stockholder and have no other association with Roth. As I am a good citizen with no police record I am in 'good standing' in my community, but alas I have no certificate stating so. Similarly, Roth is in 'good standing' with the FDA as they have never received a warning letter from the FDA nor has any legal action ever been taken against Roth or any of its executives to my knowledge. I doubt that the FDA even issues certificates for 'good standing'. Seriously, 'good standing' is a default status for having a clean record.

Ref. posts #8089 and #8099:

You state "ROTH like several other SHELLS use his law firm address". Your statement implies that Roth is also a shell company, but this is not true. A shell company is a company in name only that does no actual business, but Roth is doing business in selling Sucanon. Roth is not a shell company.


As for responses to this post, you will all have to wait till tomorrow for my 'post of the day'.