I can respect your opinion but as far as balanced that means that you weigh both sides. I agree Dr Langer is top shelf, the board members and management staff appear to be the cream of the crop.
I made my conclusions based upon the reports the company has been filing over the past five years. Yes there are many fine hospitals and expert doctors involved but if one were to spend the time and look at what the hospitals do such as Iowa University system you have a number of 57,000 total patients for 2015. However, subtract out the sore throats and other minor ailments at the walk in clinics along with oncology and the other 198 specialties this system advertises. Then I considered that I did not see anywhere in there literature that they were the go to system for spine, back, cranial and major trauma such as one would have from blunt force, gun shot, and car accidents within their region or state. If one would further research the other medical facilities it is no wander that only ten patients have been allowed into the study. Then you have the insurance industry own studies that are bleak at best for reimbursements which means companies such as INVIVO will be forced to receive much less than they should just to be in the market place. I also made my conclusion based upon the world economic outlook for the next few years. Items such as the feds gaurantee to raise rates which will affect the market volatility, housing starts, and all the new jobs created that pay next to nothing, the federal debt, the ECB and JCB coupled with Brexit not to mention Turkish Lihr and Mexican Peso taking a dive. All of these factors along with many others brought me to my conclusion.
Feel free to continue to offer up your thoughts as I always appreciate the intellectual challenge.
