Many insurance plans do not offer IVF, just as it is not covered in Canada's vaunted single payer system. The higher quality coverage in the US does, but I doubt you'll find that in garden variety plans, or you might get partial coverage. Everything in the US system of insurance is partial. A crazy but true statistic is that most people declaring personal BK in the US do so because of a medical crisis, and most of those ARE insured, just not fully, like we pretty much are in Canada. Sorry for flapping, what I meant to get at is that the INVO system may be as effective, but it is not yet proven in the field, or more importantly, in the mind of the physician and patient to be so, but that should change as stats begin to emerge, I hope. A surer bet at this time, is still traditional IVF. A previous poster mentioned time, precious little of it in the face a ticking biological clock, and that was a powerful statement. He's right, anybody in that situation, with decent insurance coverage will most definitely opt for IVF, and that's if they are even given the choice, which in 98% or more of cases, isn't even available yet. But what of the younger couple or aspiring mom with less stellar insurance coverage, or none at all in that department? Plus the fact that younger patients might be more attracted to the more personal, less clinical INVO procedure. Racing against the clock, 'sentimental' stuff like that goes out the window, but younger folks are still thinking that way. And if it fails, they can still go the IVF route. There is a big market for this device IMO. And a big opportunity for clinics that are willing to adopt it.
