InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 1502
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2005

Re: DewDiligence post# 13442

Wednesday, 10/12/2016 12:46:53 PM

Wednesday, October 12, 2016 12:46:53 PM

Post# of 29247
the speculations that BP's GAB wells could produce Macondo-like hazards to near shore aquaculture and fisheries are completely fallacious. 1. The closest of BP's exploration wells is about 200 km offshore (>2x the proximity of the Macondo well) and 2. the currents there would sweep any spills to the east and the nearest land in that direction is about 300 km.

The weather and currents would potentially pose problems but as links below show, folks have been drilling in the Bight for ~50 yrs. Most of those wells were much closer to land and the local human populations
http://www.petroleum.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/frequently_asked_questions/Petroleum_Exploration_in_the_Great_Australian_Bight

http://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/energy/province-sedimentary-basin-geology/petroleum/offshore-southern-australia/bight#heading-5

this link seems to indicate that BP's GAB plans have been on the political rocks for a while
http://www.offshoreenergytoday.com/bp-files-second-plan-for-great-australian-bight-drilling/



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.